A 64-Channel Versatile Neural Recording SoC With Activity-Dependent Data Throughput

Modern microtechnology is enabling the channel count of neural recording integrated circuits to scale exponentially. However, the raw data bandwidth of these systems is increasing proportionately, presenting major challenges in terms of power consumption and data transmission (especially for wireless systems). This paper presents a system that exploits the sparse nature of neural signals to address these challenges and provides a reconfigurable low-bandwidth event-driven output. Specifically, we present a novel 64-channel low-noise (2.1 <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu$</tex-math></inline-formula>V<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$_{\text{rms}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), low-power (23 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu$</tex-math> </inline-formula>W per analogue channel) neural recording system-on-chip (SoC). This features individually configurable channels, 10-bit analogue-to-digital conversion, digital filtering, spike detection, and an event-driven output. Each channel's gain, bandwidth, and sampling rate settings can be independently configured to extract local field potentials at a low data-rate and/or action potentials (APs) at a higher data rate. The sampled data are streamed through an SRAM buffer that supports additional on-chip processing such as digital filtering and spike detection. Real-time spike detection can achieve <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim$</tex-math></inline-formula>2 orders of magnitude data reduction, by using a dual polarity simple threshold to enable an event driven output for neural spikes (16-sample window). The SoC additionally features a latency-encoded asynchronous output that is critical if used as part of a closed-loop system. This has been specifically developed to complement a separate on-node spike sorting coprocessor to provide a real-time (low latency) output. The system has been implemented in a commercially available 0.35-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu$</tex-math></inline-formula>m CMOS technology occupying a silicon area of 19.1 mm<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^2$</tex-math></inline-formula> (0.3 mm <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^2$</tex-math></inline-formula> gross per channel), demonstrating a low-power and efficient architecture that could be further optimized by aggressive technology and supply voltage scaling.

[1]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  A 0.013 ${\hbox {mm}}^{2}$, 5 $\mu\hbox{W}$ , DC-Coupled Neural Signal Acquisition IC With 0.5 V Supply , 2012, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[2]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  A 4.78 mm 2 Fully-Integrated Neuromodulation SoC Combining 64 Acquisition Channels With Digital Compression and Simultaneous Dual Stimulation , 2015, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[3]  Hariprasad Chandrakumar,et al.  A High Dynamic-Range Neural Recording Chopper Amplifier for Simultaneous Neural Recording and Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[4]  Patrick D. Wolf,et al.  Evaluation of spike-detection algorithms fora brain-machine interface application , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  A Low-Noise Preamplifier with Adjustable Gain and Bandwidth for Biopotential Recording Applications , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[6]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Jan Van der Spiegel,et al.  A Fully Integrated Wireless Compressed Sensing Neural Signal Acquisition System for Chronic Recording and Brain Machine Interface , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[8]  Euisik Yoon,et al.  State-of-the-art MEMS and microsystem tools for brain research , 2017, Microsystems & Nanoengineering.

[9]  Roman Genov,et al.  Low-Frequency Noise and Offset Rejection in DC-Coupled Neural Amplifiers: A Review and Digitally-Assisted Design Tutorial , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[10]  Yong Lian,et al.  A 1-V 450-nW Fully Integrated Programmable Biomedical Sensor Interface Chip , 2009, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[11]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Minimum requirements for accurate and efficient real-time on-chip spike sorting , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Jeremy Holleman,et al.  An Ultralow-Power Low-Noise CMOS Biopotential Amplifier for Neural Recording , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[13]  Thomas M. Hall,et al.  A Common Structure Underlies Low-Frequency Cortical Dynamics in Movement, Sleep, and Sedation , 2014, Neuron.

[14]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  A Low-Power 32-Channel Digitally Programmable Neural Recording Integrated Circuit , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[15]  Timothy G. Constandinou,et al.  An event-driven SoC for neural recording , 2016, 2016 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[16]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  An Energy-Efficient Micropower Neural Recording Amplifier , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[17]  Timothy G. Constandinou,et al.  Live demonstration: A scalable 32-channel neural recording and real-time FPGA based spike sorting system , 2015, 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[18]  Konrad P Kording,et al.  How advances in neural recording affect data analysis , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Manuel Delgado-Restituto,et al.  System-Level Design of a 64-Channel Low Power Neural Spike Recording Sensor , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[20]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[21]  Ángel Rodríguez-Vázquez,et al.  A Low-Power Programmable Neural Spike Detection Channel With Embedded Calibration and Data Compression , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[22]  Pedram Mohseni,et al.  A Battery-Powered Activity-Dependent Intracortical Microstimulation IC for Brain-Machine-Brain Interface , 2011, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[23]  Fernando Manuel Medeiro Hidalgo,et al.  A 515 nW, 0–18 dB Programmable Gain Analog-to-Digital Converter for In-Channel Neural Recording Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[24]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Design of Ultra-Low Power Biopotential Amplifiers for Biosignal Acquisition Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[25]  Teresa H. Y. Meng,et al.  HermesE: A 96-Channel Full Data Rate Direct Neural Interface in 0.13 $\mu$ m CMOS , 2012, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[26]  R. R. Harrison,et al.  A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications , 2003, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[27]  Shuang Song,et al.  A Low-Voltage Chopper-Stabilized Amplifier for Fetal ECG Monitoring With a 1.41 Power Efficiency Factor , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[28]  Robert D Flint,et al.  Long-Term Stability of Motor Cortical Activity: Implications for Brain Machine Interfaces and Optimal Feedback Control , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Wenlong Jiang,et al.  A ±50-mV Linear-Input-Range VCO-Based Neural-Recording Front-End With Digital Nonlinearity Correction , 2017, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[30]  Timothy G. Constandinou,et al.  An Analogue Front-End Model for Developing Neural Spike Sorting Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[31]  Timothy G. Constandinou,et al.  A 1.5 μW NEO-based spike detector with adaptive-threshold for calibration-free multichannel neural interfaces , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013).

[32]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Real-time estimation and biofeedback of single-neuron firing rates using local field potentials , 2014, Nature Communications.

[33]  Amir Eftekhar,et al.  Towards a next generation neural interface: Optimizing power, bandwidth and data quality , 2010, 2010 Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[34]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  How many neurons can we see with current spike sorting algorithms? , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  A.-T. Avestruz,et al.  A 2 $\mu\hbox{W}$ 100 nV/rtHz Chopper-Stabilized Instrumentation Amplifier for Chronic Measurement of Neural Field Potentials , 2007, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[36]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A 500µW neural tag with 2µVrms AFE and frequency-multiplying MICS/ISM FSK transmitter , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.