Comparison of two data assimilation methods for assessing PM10 exceedances on the European scale

Two different data assimilation techniques have been applied to assess exceedances of the daily and annual mean limit values for PM10 on the regional scale in Europe. The two methods include a statistical interpolation method (SI), based on residual kriging after linear regression of the model, and ensemble Kalman filtering (EnKF). Both methods are applied using the LOTOS-EUROS model. Observations for the assimilation and validation of the methods have been retrieved from the Airbase database using rural background stations only. The LOTOS-EUROS model is found to underestimate PM10 concentrations by a factor of 2. This large model bias is found to be prohibitive for the effective use of the EnKF methodology and a bias correction was required for the filter to function effectively. The results of the study show that both methods provide significant improvement on the model calculations when compared to an independent set of validation stations. The most effective methodology is found to be the statistical interpolation method.

[1]  Renske Timmermans,et al.  The LOTOS?EUROS model: description, validation and latest developments , 2008 .

[2]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  A Sequential Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 2001 .

[3]  Hauke Schmidt,et al.  A four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling , 1999 .

[4]  Arlindo da Silva,et al.  Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias , 1998 .

[5]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[6]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[7]  Emil M. Constantinescu,et al.  Assessment of ensemble-based chemical data assimilation in an idealized setting , 2007 .

[8]  Richard J. Engelen,et al.  Estimating atmospheric CO2 from advanced infrared satellite radiances within an operational four‐dimensional variational (4D‐Var) data assimilation system: Results and validation , 2005 .

[9]  Montserrat Fuentes,et al.  Model Evaluation and Spatial Interpolation by Bayesian Combination of Observations with Outputs from Numerical Models , 2005, Biometrics.

[10]  D. Cocchi,et al.  Hierarchical space-time modelling of PM10 pollution , 2007 .

[11]  B. Denby,et al.  Spatial mapping of air quality for European scale assessment , 2006 .

[12]  Arjo Segers,et al.  Data assimilation of ozone in the atmospheric transport chemistry model LOTOS , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[14]  O. Talagrand,et al.  4D-variational data assimilation with an adjoint air quality model for emission analysis , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Arnold Heemink,et al.  Data assimilation of ground-level ozone in Europe with a Kalman filter and chemistry transport model , 2004 .

[16]  A. Stein,et al.  Statistical mapping of PM10 concentrations over Western Europe using secondary information from dispersion modeling and MODIS satellite observations , 2006 .

[17]  Guus J. M. Velders,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of local NO2 concentrations derived from error-in-variable external drift kriging and its relationship to the 2010 air quality standard , 2006 .

[18]  Philippe Thunis,et al.  Evaluation of long-term ozone simulations from seven regional air quality models and their ensemble , 2007 .

[19]  Nadège Blond,et al.  Three-dimensional ozone data analysis with an air quality model over the Paris area , 2003 .

[20]  A.J.H. Visschedijk,et al.  Anthropogenic black carbon and fine aerosol distribution over Europe , 2004 .