Multiple-Point Simulation with an Existing Reservoir Model as Training Image

The multiple-point simulation (MPS) method has been increasingly used to describe the complex geologic features of petroleum reservoirs. The MPS method is based on multiple-point statistics from training images that represent geologic patterns of the reservoir heterogeneity. The traditional MPS algorithm, however, requires the training images to be stationary in space, although the spatial distribution of geologic patterns/features is usually nonstationary. Building geologically realistic but statistically stationary training images is somehow contradictory for reservoir modelers. In recent research on MPS, the concept of a training image has been widely extended. The MPS approach is no longer restricted by the size or the stationarity of training images; a training image can be a small geometrical element or a full-field reservoir model. In this paper, the different types of training images and their corresponding MPS algorithms are first reviewed. Then focus is placed on a case where a reservoir model exists, but needs to be conditioned to well data. The existing model can be built by process-based, object-based, or any other type of reservoir modeling approach. In general, the geologic patterns in a reservoir model are constrained by depositional environment, seismic data, or other trend maps. Thus, they are nonstationary, in the sense that they are location dependent. A new MPS algorithm is proposed that can use any existing model as training image and condition it to well data. In particular, this algorithm is a practical solution for conditioning geologic-process-based reservoir models to well data.

[1]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  An Improved Parallel Multiple-point Algorithm Using a List Approach , 2011 .

[2]  L. Hu,et al.  Multiple-Point Simulations Constrained by Continuous Auxiliary Data , 2008 .

[3]  R. M. Srivastava,et al.  Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments , 1993 .

[4]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Application of Multiple Point Geostatistics to Non-stationary Images , 2008 .

[5]  A. Soares,et al.  Geostatistics Tróia '92 , 1993 .

[6]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Modeling complex geological structures with elementary training images and transform‐invariant distances , 2011 .

[7]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Beyond Covariance: The Advent of Multiple-Point Geostatistics , 2005 .

[8]  Jef Caers,et al.  Multi-point geostatistics – an introductory overview , 2010 .

[9]  Benoit Noetinger,et al.  Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Sequential Stochastic Simulations , 2001 .

[10]  Y. Liu,et al.  Updating multipoint simulations using the ensemble Kalman filter , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  Jef Caers,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: A Quantitative Vehicle for Integrating Geologic Analogs into Multiple Reservoir Models , 2004 .

[12]  L. Y. Hu,et al.  Multiple‐point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: A comprehensive review , 2008 .

[13]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  A SGeMS code for pattern simulation of continuous and categorical variables: FILTERSIM , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  Yuhong Liu,et al.  Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  Jef Caers,et al.  Direct Pattern-Based Simulation of Non-stationary Geostatistical Models , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[16]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2002 .

[17]  C. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistics Banff 2004 , 2005 .

[18]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Non-Stationary Multiple-point Geostatistical Models , 2005 .