NMB4.0: development of integrated nuclear fuel cycle simulator from the front to back-end

Nuclear Material Balance code version 4.0 (NMB4.0) has been developed through collaborative R&D between TokyoTech&JAEA. Conventional nuclear fuel cycle simulation codes mainly analyze actinides and are specialized for front-end mass balance analysis. However, quantitative back-end simulation has recently become necessary for considering R&D strategies and sustainable nuclear energy utilization. Therefore, NMB4.0 was developed to realize the integrated nuclear fuel cycle simulation from front- to back-end. There are three technical features in NMB4.0: 179 nuclides are tracked, more than any other code, throughout the nuclear fuel cycle; the Okamura explicit method is implemented, which contributes to reducing the numerical cost while maintaining the accuracy of depletion calculations on nuclides with a shorter half-life; and flexibility of back-end simulation is achieved. The main objective of this paper is to show the newly developed functions, made for integrated back-end simulation, and verify NMB4.0 through a benchmark study to show the computational performance.

[1]  H. Asano,et al.  Evaluation of the technical options of radioactive waste management for utilization of MOX fuel: thermal impact of minor actinide separation with geological disposal of high-level waste , 2021, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology.

[2]  G. Krivtchik,et al.  COSI7: THE NEW CEA REFERENCE ELECTRO-NUCLEAR SIMULATION TOOL , 2021, EPJ Web of Conferences.

[3]  G. Van den Eynde,et al.  The nuclear fuel cycle code ANICCA: Verification and a case study for the phase out of Belgian nuclear power with minor actinide transmutation , 2020 .

[4]  T. Okamura,et al.  Effect of Cs and Sr separation on occupied area reduction in current nuclear energy system and its evaluation by CAERA index , 2019, Separation Science and Technology.

[5]  Jeffrey J. Powers,et al.  Standardized verification of fuel cycle modeling , 2016 .

[6]  C. Cany,et al.  COSI6: A Tool for Nuclear Transition Scenario Studies and Application to SFR Deployment Scenarios with Minor Actinide Transmutation , 2015 .

[7]  F. Álvarez-Velarde,et al.  Validation of the burn-up code EVOLCODE 2.0 with PWR experimental data and with a Sensitivity/Uncertainty analysis , 2014 .

[8]  H. Akie,et al.  Utilization of rock-like oxide fuel in the phase-out scenario , 2014 .

[9]  A. M. Yacout,et al.  Verifiable Fuel Cycle Simulation Model (VISION): A Tool for Analyzing Nuclear Fuel Cycle Futures , 2010 .

[10]  Daniel López,et al.  Cross check of the new economic and mass balance features of the fuel cycle scenario code TR_EVOL , 2016 .

[11]  英明 鈴木,et al.  熱-水-応力-化学連成解析による緩衝材の地球化学環境の変遷に着目したニアフィールド長期挙動評価の一例 , 2012 .

[12]  核燃料サイクル開発機構 Safety assessment of the geological disposal system , 2000 .