Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal.

Large joint implants must have immediate fixation to be successful. Unfortunately, the magnitude and consistency of achieving this remains largely unknown. For cementless femoral components it is being increasingly appreciated that torsional loading as occurs during stair climbing or rising from a chair leads to loosening and thigh pain in some cases. A biomechanical test was developed to evaluate fixation in this position. Twelve pairs of human cadaveric femora were press-fit with an AML stem. Each femur was secured in a horizontal position, and the prosthetic head cyclically loaded in a vertically downward direction. The offset of the prosthetic head resulted in a combined torsional and compressive load being applied to the stem within the proximal femur. Loosening was found to consistently occur and rapidly accelerate when the head subsided more than 0.2 mm during 100 cycles. For the AML stem, loosening developed at loads from 62 to 171% of body weight and after as few as 800 cycles. This is within the physiologic range of normal daily activities as measured by others with instrumented prostheses. This poses a challenge to the ability of press-fit stems to tolerate torsional loads in vivo. Patients with a cementless prosthesis should be protected from torsional loading until porous ingrowth and/or bone remodelling have had time to occur. Testing the same stem in paired femora demonstrated no right vs left difference (p greater than 0.6).

[1]  L. Riley,et al.  Considerations in the comparison of cemented and cementless total hip prostheses. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  M A Freeman,et al.  Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Engh,et al.  Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating. A five-year study. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  N. Rydell Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  J. Newman,et al.  Fractures of the femur in relation to cemented hip prostheses. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  R W Mann,et al.  Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  R M Rose,et al.  Changes in the bone-cement interface after total hip replacement. An in vivo animal study. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J B Finlay,et al.  In vitro analysis of proximal femoral strains using PCA femoral implants and a hip-abductor muscle simulator. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  E. Morscher Cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The effects of the collar on total hip femoral component subsidence. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Nonoperative treatment of a postoperative fracture around an uncemented porous-coated femoral component. , 1989, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  W H Harris,et al.  Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J O Galante,et al.  Causes of fractures of the femoral component in total hip replacement. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  E. F. Byars,et al.  EFFECT OF EMBALMING ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BEEF BONE. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  W. Maloney,et al.  Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  G Selvik,et al.  Instability of total hip prostheses at rotational stress. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  L. Whiteside,et al.  Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  D T Davy,et al.  Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  D. Daniel,et al.  Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate-ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Three dimensional stress analysis of the femoral stem of a total hip prosthesis. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Engh Ca,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988 .

[25]  P S Walker,et al.  Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  C. Engh,et al.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.