First evidence for the reliability of building co-heating tests

ABSTRACT This paper provides powerful evidence empirically demonstrating for the first time the reliability of the co-heating test. The test is widely used throughout Europe to measure the total heat transfer through the fabric of buildings and to calculate the heat-transfer coefficient (HTC; units W/K). A reliable test is essential to address the ‘performance gap’, where in-use energy performance is consistently, and often substantially, poorer than predicted. The co-heating test could meet this need, but its reliability requires confirmation. Seven teams independently conducted co-heating tests on the same detached house near Watford, UK. Despite differences in the weather and in the experimental and analytical approaches, the teams’ final reported HTC measurements were within ±10% of the mean. With further standardization it is likely to be possible to improve upon this reproducibility. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis based upon a 95% confidence interval resulted in an estimated uncertainty in HTC measurements of ±8%. This research addresses persistent doubts about the reliability of the co-heating test. Avenues to further improvement of the test are discussed. This work helps to enable the test’s wider adoption as a component of the regulatory process and thus improvements to standards of house construction.

[1]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Evidence for heat losses via party wall cavities in masonry construction , 2007 .

[2]  K. Subbarao,et al.  PSTAR: Primary and secondary terms analysis and renormalization: A unified approach to building energy simulations and short-term monitoring , 1988 .

[3]  Sf Stamp.  Assessing uncertainty in co-heating tests: Calibrating a whole building steady state heat loss measurement method , 2016 .

[4]  R. Tricker,et al.  The Building Regulations 2010 , 2017 .

[5]  Peter Manning.  Environmental design as a routine , 1995 .

[6]  Jennifer A. White,et al.  An investigation into the parameters that contribute to the gap between the designed and as-built thermal performance of British housing , 2014 .

[7]  Geert Bauwens,et al.  Co-heating test: A state-of-the-art , 2014 .

[8]  Matthew Brooke-Peat,et al.  Bridging the domestic building fabric performance gap , 2016 .

[9]  D Miles-Shenton,et al.  Obtaining the heat loss coefficient of a dwelling using its heating system (integrated coheating) , 2016 .

[10]  Patrick James,et al.  A simple, scalable and low-cost method to generate thermal diagnostics of a domestic building , 2014 .

[11]  H. Visscher,et al.  Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing , 2016 .

[12]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation , 2014 .

[13]  Christopher Gorse,et al.  Adding value and meaning to coheating tests , 2014 .

[14]  David Johnston,et al.  Whole House Heat Loss Test Method (Coheating) , 2012 .

[15]  M. Sherman.  Estimation of Infiltration from Leakage and Climate Indicators. , 1987 .

[16]  Industrial Strategy,et al.  Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics , 2020 .

[17]  Eric Mangematin,et al.  Quick measurements of energy efficiency of buildings , 2012 .

[18]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Comparison of measurements and simulations of a passive house , 2005 .

[19]  Dennis L. Loveday,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Window Opening on the Measured Heat Loss of a Test House , 2016 .

[20]  Huw Jenkins,et al.  The validity and reliability of co-heating tests made on highly insulated dwellings , 2015 .

[21]  Olivia Guerra-Santin,et al.  Monitoring the performance of low energy dwellings: Two UK case studies , 2013 .

[22]  Richard Jack.  Building diagnostics : practical measurement of the fabric thermal performance of houses , 2015 .

[23]  Geert Bauwens,et al.  RELIABILITY OF CO-HEATING MEASUREMENTS , 2012 .

[24]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Sensitivity analysis techniques for building thermal simulation programs , 1992 .

[25]  Roulet Claude-Alain,et al.  Simple and Cheap Air Change Rate Measurement Using CO2 Concentration Decays , 2002 .

[26]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Intent and outcomes from the Retrofit for the Future programme: key lessons , 2015 .