Nurturing a learning organization in construction: a focus on strategic shift, organizational transformation, customer orientation and quality centered learning

The construction industry resides in a period of intense introspection as it seeks to improve its performance and productivity. Yet, yielding such improvements requires each individual organization to adopt a customer value strategy that enables organizational learning to become an integral part of an organization’s fabric. This paper reviews the elements of a learning organization within the context of the construction environment. A conceptual framework that can provide managers with a better understanding of how a learning organization in construction can be nurtured is presented. Embodied within this framework are factors such as strategic shift, organization transformation, customer orientation and quality centered learning. The paper concludes by suggesting that the key success factor for each individual organization may no longer be a matter of size or the number of assets, but the amount and quality of experience it can apply and manage.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[3]  Russell A. Eisenstat,et al.  The Critical Path to Corporate Renewal , 1990 .

[4]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm , 1991 .

[5]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[7]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Organizing Work by Adaptation , 1991 .

[8]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[11]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[12]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[13]  M. Dodgson Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[14]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[15]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[16]  Fred Luthans,et al.  GOING BEYOND TOTAL QUALITY: THE CHARACTERISTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND MEASURES OF LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS , 1995 .

[17]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[18]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the Field , 1995 .

[19]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[20]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  RETHINKING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION , 1995 .

[21]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Options for applying BPR in the Australian construction industry , 1996 .

[22]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Redesigning production through teamworking: Case studies from the Volvo Truck Corporation , 1996 .

[23]  Bill Buckler,et al.  A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation , 1996 .

[24]  Alan Harrison,et al.  New wave manufacturing strategies , 1996 .

[25]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research , 1996 .

[26]  T. Garavan The learning organization: a review and evaluation , 1997 .

[27]  M. Terziovski,et al.  The Business Value of Quality Management Systems Certification , 1997 .

[28]  Will Rifkin,et al.  A review and case study on learning organizations , 1997 .

[29]  A. Cox,et al.  ‘Fit for purpose’ contractual relations: determining a theoretical framework for construction projects , 1997 .

[30]  Peter E. D. Love,et al.  From BPR to CPR - conceptualising re-engineering in construction , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations , 1998 .

[32]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[33]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Re‐thinking TQM: toward a framework for facilitating learning and change in construction organizations , 2000 .

[35]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Overcoming the problems associated with quality certification , 2000 .

[36]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  From learning organisation to knowledge entrepreneur , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[37]  Peter E. D. Love,et al.  Construction business performance measurement: the SPM alternative , 2000, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[38]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[39]  Francis Tekyi Edum-Fotwe,et al.  Measuring construction contractors' organizational learning , 2001 .

[40]  Z. Irani,et al.  Learning to Reduce Rework in Projects: Analysis of Firm's Organizational Learning and Quality Practices , 2003 .

[41]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  BENCHMARKING, BENCHACTION, AND BENCHLEARNING: REWORK MITIGATION IN PROJECTS , 2003 .