High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate.

BACKGROUND A scoring system has been developed to determine preimplantation embryo quality, and used to select embryos for transfer into the uterus of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS The system was used to study early embryo development and to test whether these scores alone can accurately predict IVF outcome. Following zygote and embryo scores through early development, the data showed that a top quality zygote does not necessarily indicate that the resulting embryo will be top quality after in-vitro culture. The embryo quality score can change dramatically when embryos are cultured to day 2 or 3 post-fertilization. Pregnancy rates and implantation rates were compared with the cumulative and separated zygote and embryo scores. Analysis of the predictability of scoring systems suggested that morphological scores alone are relatively unpredictive of IVF outcome. When weighted for in-vitro growth rate, scores were highly predictive, more so than the rate of development alone. CONCLUSIONS These data suggested that a combination of in-vitro growth rate and morphological analysis both of zygotes and embryos was highly indicative of outcome after IVF. The results can be adopted to the single embryo transfer approach to IVF.

[1]  D. Gardner,et al.  Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  D S Visser,et al.  Fertilization and early embryology: The applicability of the cumulative embryo score system for embryo selection and quality control in an in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme , 1993 .

[3]  K Petersen,et al.  Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[4]  Y Hu,et al.  Maximizing pregnancy rates and limiting higher-order multiple conceptions by determining the optimal number of embryos to transfer based on quality. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  P Barlow,et al.  Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. , 1987, Human reproduction.

[6]  J Cohen,et al.  Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  M. Dhont,et al.  Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer? , 1998, Human reproduction.

[8]  J. Tesarik,et al.  Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[9]  G. Pennings.  Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: multiple pregnancies: a test case for the moral quality of medically assisted reproduction. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[10]  J. Cohen,et al.  Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[11]  C. Jansen,et al.  The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[12]  C. Rongières,et al.  Zygote evaluation: an efficient tool for embryo selection. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[13]  L A Scott,et al.  The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[14]  J. Habbema,et al.  Age-dependent decrease in embryo implantation rate after in vitro fertilization. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  R. Marrs,et al.  Suboptimal laboratory conditions can affect pregnancy outcome after embryo transfer on day 1 or 2 after insemination in vitro. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  J. Tesarik,et al.  The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[17]  K. Ahuja,et al.  Successful pregnancies from the transfer of pronucleate embryos in an outpatient in vitro fertilization program. , 1985, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  N. Desai,et al.  Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[19]  D. Gardner,et al.  Extended embryo culture in human assisted reproduction treatments. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[20]  C. Racowsky,et al.  The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  R. Edwards,et al.  ESTABLISHING FULL‐TERM HUMAN PREGNANCIES USING CLEAVING EMBRYOS GROWN IN VITRO * , 1980, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  K. Diedrich,et al.  Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[23]  C. Giorgetti,et al.  Implantation: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers , 1995 .

[24]  B. Dale,et al.  Zygote Versus Embryo Transfer: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial , 2002, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[25]  K Lundin,et al.  Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[26]  D. Gardner,et al.  Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. , 1999, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[27]  D. De Neubourg,et al.  Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[28]  J Cohen,et al.  Impaired development of zygotes with uneven pronuclear size , 1998, Zygote.

[29]  R. Alvero,et al.  The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. , 2000, Human reproduction.