Adaptive Performance-Based Classifier Combination for Generic Object Recognition

It is well-established in the pattern recognition community that the performance of classifiers can be greatly improved by combining the outputs of multiple classifiers. In this paper, we introduce the concept of adaptive performance-based classifier combination, i.e., the weighting of classifiers based on their estimated recognition performance, to generic object recognition. Using an expectationmaximization (EM) algorithm previously applied to image segmentation, we learn the characteristics of individual generic object recognition classifiers. Using the ETH-80 data sets we demonstrate that by incorporating these performance estimates in a Bayesian classifier combination, the recognition rate of the combined classifications improves substantially over feature combination as well as simple and confidence-based voting. The EM algorithm has no tunable parameters and does not require a pre-classified training set during the learning stage. We conclude that adaptive performancebased classifier combination is a valuable and versatile tool to improve the performance of generic object recognition systems.

[1]  Santanu Chaudhury,et al.  Appearance based Generic Object Recognition , 2000 .

[2]  Agnès Blaye,et al.  Categorization and abstraction abilities in 3-year-old children: a comparison with monkey data , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[3]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  B. Schiele,et al.  Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model , 2004 .

[5]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Generic Hierarchic Object Models and Classification Based on Probabilistic PCA , 2002, MVA.

[6]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Appearance Based Generic Object Modeling and Recognition Using Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 2002, DAGM-Symposium.

[7]  S. Gelman Psychological essentialism in children , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  3D structures for generic object recognition , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[9]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  J. Denzler,et al.  Comparison of Appearance-Based Methods for Generic Object Recognition 1,2 , 2004 .

[11]  Y. LeCun,et al.  Learning methods for generic object recognition with invariance to pose and lighting , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Learning Generative Visual Models from Few Training Examples: An Incremental Bayesian Approach Tested on 101 Object Categories , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[14]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Analyzing appearance and contour based methods for object categorization , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[15]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[16]  Adam Krzyżak,et al.  Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.