Situation and problem: a course‐writing team needs to converge rapidly to what it regards as: an agreed topic structure, which is keyed to agreed learning objectives, which specify relevant assessment questions in a natural learning sequence. Only then can the team members go away individually to write, knowing that everything that they write will fit together. In normal practice, this convergence is only partial: the topic structure harbors gaps, ambiguities and contradictions; the learning objectives are not keyed explicitly to the concepts in the topic structure; and questions for assessment of learners’ understanding do not directly exemplify conceptually keyed learning objectives. The result is courseware which does not help people to learn as well as it otherwise could, and which has been created with more effort than otherwise would have been needed. This paper shows how systemic methods inspired by Gordon Pask can be used to complete the necessary convergence with ease.
[1]
Mark Woodman.
Using a Computerized Relational Glossary for Syllabus Design and Student-Centered Study.
,
1994
.
[2]
Gordon Pask,et al.
A theory of conversations and individuals (Exemplified by the Learning Process on CASTE)
,
1973
.
[3]
R. Gagne.
Conditions of Learning
,
1965
.
[4]
Brian N. Lewis.
Educational Technology at the Open University: An Approach to the Problem of Quality.
,
1973
.
[5]
Robert Frank Mager,et al.
Preparing Instructional Objectives
,
1962
.
[6]
Gordon Pask,et al.
The Representation of Knowables
,
1975,
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[7]
Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.
,
1957
.
[8]
R. Lambourne,et al.
The Flexible Learning Approach to Physics (FLAP) : a review after the first two years
,
1999
.
[9]
G. Pask.
Conversation, Cognition and Learning
,
1975
.