Engine Variable Impact Analysis of Fuel Use and Emissions for Heavy-Duty Diesel Maintenance Equipment

Heavy-duty diesel maintenance equipment consumes significant amounts of fuel and consequently emits substantial quantities of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to identify which engine activity variables had the greatest impact on fuel use and emissions rates. A real-world data set was used for a case study fleet containing backhoes, motor graders, and wheel loaders. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the relationships between engine activity variables and fuel use and emissions rates. The engine activity variables of engine speed, manifold absolute pressure, and intake air temperature were used to predict mass per time fuel use and emissions rates of nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter. The results indicated that manifold absolute pressure had the greatest impact on fuel use and emissions rate predictions. Based on this finding, fuel use and emissions estimating models based on manifold absolute pressure were developed as a practical estimating tool for practitioners.

[1]  Apif M. Hajji,et al.  Development of productivity‐based estimating tool for energy and air emissions from earthwork construction activities , 2013 .

[2]  Ulrich Amsel,et al.  Estimating Construction Costs , 2016 .

[3]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Requirements and Incentives for Reducing Construction Vehicle Emissions and Comparison of Nonroad Diesel Engine Emissions Data Sources , 2009 .

[4]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Development and Use of Emissions Inventories for Construction Vehicles , 2009 .

[5]  Robert L. Peurifoy,et al.  Construction planning, equipment and methods , 1956 .

[6]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Field Procedures for Real-World Measurements of Emissions from Diesel Construction Vehicles , 2010 .

[7]  Herbert L. Nichols Moving the Earth: The Workbook of Excavation , 1976 .

[8]  M. Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Integrated Framework for Estimating, Benchmarking, and Monitoring Pollutant Emissions of Construction Operations , 2013 .

[9]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Impact of Engine Idling on Fuel Use and CO2 Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2012 .

[10]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Assessing Effects of Operational Efficiency on Pollutant Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2011 .

[11]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comprehensive Field Study of Fuel Use and Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2010 .

[12]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Real-World Emissions of B20 Biodiesel versus Petroleum Diesel for Selected Nonroad Vehicles and Engine Tiers , 2008 .

[13]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Methodology for Activity, Fuel Use, and Emissions Data Collection and Analysis for Nonroad Construction Equipment , 2007 .

[14]  William Rasdorf,et al.  Effects of Engine Idling on National Ambient Air Quality Standards Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment , 2012 .