Evolution of mixed maturation strategies in semelparous life histories: the crucial role of dimensionality of feedback environment

We study the evolution of age at maturity in a semelparous life history with two age classes. An individual may either breed in the first year of its life and die, or delay breeding to the second year. In this setting a mixed strategy means that a fraction of the individual's offspring breed in the first possible breeding event, while the remaining fraction delay breeding. Current theory seems to imply that mixed strategies are not evolutionarily stable strategies (ESSs) under a steady-state population dynamical regime. We show that a two-dimensional feedback environment may allow the evolution of mixed age at maturity. Furthermore, different phenotypes need to perceive the environment differently. The biological reasoning behind these conditions is different resource usage or predation pressure between two age classes. Thus, the conventional explanations for the occurrence of mixed strategies in natural populations, environmental stochasticity or complex dynamics, are not needed.

[1]  W. Getz,et al.  Ecogenetic Analysis and Evolutionary Stable Strategies in Harvested Populations , 1993 .

[2]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[3]  W. Getz,et al.  Population dynamics and harvesting of semelparous species with phenotypic and genotypic variability in reproductive age , 1995 .

[4]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[5]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence , 1995 .

[6]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[7]  E. Charnov,et al.  Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  When Does Evolution Optimize? On the Relation Between Types of Density Dependence and Evolutionarily Stable Life History Parameters , 1996 .

[9]  V. Kaitala,et al.  A Theory of Partial Migration , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[10]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of competition within and between age classes , 1994 .

[11]  I. Eshel.  On the changing concept of evolutionary population stability as a reflection of a changing point of view in the quantitative theory of evolution , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[12]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Mark H Gromko,et al.  WHAT IS FREQUENCY‐DEPENDENT SELECTION? , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  D. Roff.  The evolution of life histories : theory and analysis , 1992 .

[15]  T. V. Van Dooren,et al.  Delayed maturation in temporally structured populations with non‐equilibrium dynamics , 1998 .

[16]  Éva Kisdi,et al.  Density dependent life history evolution in fluctuating environments , 1993 .

[17]  David R. Appleton,et al.  Modelling Biological Populations in Space and Time , 1993 .

[18]  M. Bulmer.  Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology , 1994 .

[19]  M. Morgan.  Life History Characteristics of Two Introduced Populations of Mysis Relicta , 1980 .