Organization as Reply: Henri Bergson and Casual Organization Theory

This paper introduces a symposium of three other papers on the work of Henri Bergson, which develop his idea of creative evolution and argue for the continuing relevance and vitality of Bergson's work for contemporary organization studies. Bergson's corpus is reviewed, along with some suggestions as to his relevance for contemporary organization theory. It is argued that Bergson's work would view organization as part of its object, a process that is changed by that engagement in non-dialectical conversation with it. Organizing, then, is a reply to the object, an act that creates its own possibility. Calculative and formalistic organization theory fails to take into account the importance of intuition as a form of knowing, responsive to the shifting nature of both its object and itself over time, which a casual organization theory, on Bergsonian lines, would do. However, there is no Bergsonian system or programme to be offered here-merely an introduction to some of the rich veins of ideas in his work, and an invitation to engage with them-an invitation, which, like all invitations, invites reply.

[1]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[2]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[3]  Glenda H. Eoyang,et al.  Facilitating Organization Change: Lessons from Complexity Science , 2001 .

[4]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia,et al.  The language of organization theory , 2001 .

[5]  D. Boje Phenomenal complexity theory and change at DisneyResponse to Letiche , 2000 .

[6]  Hugo Letiche,et al.  Phenomenal complexity theory as informed by Bergson , 2000 .

[7]  Antoine E. Hatzenberger,et al.  The New Bergson , 2000 .

[8]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[9]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia A 'Rhizomic' Model of Organizational Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of Change , 1999 .

[10]  John Mullarkey,et al.  Bergson and philosophy , 1999 .

[11]  T. Sanders Strategic Thinking and the New Science: Planning in the Midst of Chaos Complexity and Change , 1998 .

[12]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia,et al.  Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice , 1996 .

[13]  F. C. T. Moore,et al.  Bergson: Thinking Backwards , 1996 .

[14]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy , 1996 .

[15]  Dallas Ouren Founders of Constructive Postmodern Philosophy , 1995 .

[16]  J. Ford,et al.  The Role Of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[17]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[18]  W. Shakespeare,et al.  The complete Oxford Shakespeare , 1988 .

[19]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Bergson and modern thought : towards a unified science , 1987 .

[20]  D. Sperber,et al.  Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction , 1981 .

[21]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[22]  A. Pilkington Bergson and his Influence: A Reassessment , 1976 .

[23]  Gilles Deleuze,et al.  Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1972 .

[24]  Milič Čapek,et al.  Bergson and Modern Physics , 1971 .

[25]  P. Gunter Bergson and the evolution of physics , 1969 .

[26]  H. Dingle,et al.  Duration and simultaneity : with reference to Einstein's theory , 1965 .

[27]  I. Alexander Bergson : philosopher of reflection , 1958 .

[28]  B. Scharfstein,et al.  The creative mind , 1946 .

[29]  H. Bergson,et al.  The Two Sources of Morality and Religion , 1935 .

[30]  H Wildon. Carr Henri Bergson: the philosophy of change , 1912 .

[31]  H. Bergson Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic , 1900 .

[32]  Jelliffe.,et al.  Matter and Memory , 1896 .