Assessment of Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis with Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography

Molecular imaging (MI) with ultrasonography relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) adhering to a ligand-specific target for applications such as characterizing tumor angiogenesis. It is projected that ultrasonic (US) MI can provide information about tumor therapeutic response before the detection of phenotypic changes. One of the limitations of preclinical US MI is that it lacks a comprehensive field of view. We attempted to improve targeted MCA visualization and quantification by performing three-dimensional (3D) MI of tumors expressing αvβ3 integrin. Volumetric acquisitions were obtained with a Siemens Sequoia system in cadence pulse sequencing mode by mechanically stepping the transducer elevationally across the tumor in 800-micron increments. MI was performed on rat fibrosarcoma tumors (n = 8) of similar sizes using MCAs conjugated with a cyclic RGD peptide targeted to αvβ3 integrin. US MI and immunohistochemical analyses show high microbubble targeting variability, suggesting that individual two-dimensional (2D) acquisitions risk misrepresenting more complex heterogeneous tissues. In 2D serial studies, where it may be challenging to image the same plane repeatedly, misalignments as small as 800 microns can introduce substantial error. 3D MI, including volumetric analysis of inter- and intra-animal targeting, provides a thorough way of characterizing angiogenesis and will be a more robust assessment technique for the future of MI.

[1]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Dual-targeted contrast agent for US assessment of tumor angiogenesis in vivo. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  J. G. Miller,et al.  A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  J. Hickson In vivo optical imaging: preclinical applications and considerations. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[4]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  US imaging of tumor angiogenesis with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in mice. , 2008, Radiology.

[5]  Y. Nagano,et al.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced sonography of vascular patterns of focal liver tumors: pilot study of visualization methods. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Schirner,et al.  Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ): A New Ultrasound-Based Approach for the Quantification of Ultrasound Contrast Media in High Concentrations , 2005, Investigative Radiology.

[7]  D. Downey,et al.  Three-dimensional sonographic reconstruction: techniques and diagnostic applications. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[9]  M. Reinhardt,et al.  Ultrasound derived imaging and quantification of cell adhesion molecules in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ) , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  Ultrasonic analysis of peptide- And antibody-targeted microbubble contrast agents for molecular imaging of α vβ 3-expressing cells , 2004 .

[11]  F. Bengel Clinical Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Advances in Molecular Imaging with Ultrasound , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[14]  Katherine W. Ferrara,et al.  Lipid-Shelled Vehicles: Engineering for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Drug Delivery , 2009 .

[15]  Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan,et al.  3D Ultrasound in Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine , 2008, Women's health.

[16]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Imaging of delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction by PET and 18F-galacto-RGD. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Roberto M. Lang,et al.  Three-dimensional adult echocardiography: Where the hidden dimension helps , 2008, Current cardiology reports.

[18]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[19]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasound Imaging of Inflammation Using Microbubbles Targeted to Activated Leukocytes , 2000, Circulation.

[20]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic responses of monodisperse lipid-encapsulated microbubble contrast agents produced by flow focusing. , 2010, Bubble science engineering and technology.

[21]  R. Weinberg,et al.  The Biology of Cancer , 2006 .

[22]  S. Simon,et al.  Ultrasonic analysis of peptide- and antibody-targeted microbubble contrast agents for molecular imaging of alphavbeta3-expressing cells. , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[23]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Quantitative Volumetric Perfusion Mapping of the Microvasculature Using Contrast Ultrasound , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2001, Current problems in cardiology.

[25]  S. Homma,et al.  Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  J. Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging of endothelial progenitor cell engraftment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and targeted microbubbles. , 2009, Cardiovascular research.

[27]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Molecular ultrasound imaging using microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[28]  Kevin Wei,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Applications and Limitations , 2012, Current problems in cardiology.

[29]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents. , 2008, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[30]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[31]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[32]  Gavin Low,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D ultrasound in the radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. , 2009, World journal of gastroenterology.

[33]  Eric Tom,et al.  Myocardial Ischemic Memory Imaging With Molecular Echocardiography , 2007, Circulation.

[34]  K. Tachibana,et al.  A novel strategy utilizing ultrasound for antigen delivery in dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[35]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[36]  Favorable biokinetic and tumor-targeting properties of 99mTc-labeled glucosamino RGD and effect of paclitaxel therapy. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Motion corrected cadence CPS ultrasound for quantifying response to vasoactive drugs in a rat kidney model. , 2009, Urology.

[38]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine. , 2005, Cancer research.

[39]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.