Fluctuating asymmetry for specific bristle characters in Notch mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

Asymmetry has been used as a measure of developmental stability for bilaterally symmetrical organisms. Most studies have failed to partition the genetic and environmental contributions to the asymmetry phenotype due to the limitations of the systems used or the shortcomings in experimental design. The Notch mutants of Drosophila melanogaster were used to study the genetic contribution to asymmetry for six different bristle characters. Asymmetry response was character specific for the mutants examined. For Nspl, NCo, N264–47, Ax71d, Ax9B2, AxE2, l(1)NB and nd2 significant asymmetry responses, relative to wildtype Canton‐S, were observed for some characters. N60g11 and nd1 did not exhibit significant asymmetry for any of the characters examined. All of the mutants except N60g11 and nd1 showed thoracic bristle asymmetry. However, when asymmetry scores were pooled over the five bristle characters which individually exhibited fluctuating asymmetry, no significant differences were found between any genotypes. Therefore pooling asymmetry values across characters obscures the significant character specific asymmetry values observed. Thus caution is necessary when using the asymmetry phenotype of specific characters to draw organism wide conclusions about developmental stability.

[1]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Environmental and genetic effects on the asymmetry phenotype: Diazinon resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. , 1996, Genetics.

[2]  D. Lindsley,et al.  The Genome of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1992 .

[3]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Asymmetry--where evolutionary and developmental genetics meet. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  A. Møller.  Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[6]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: Implications for conservation biology. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Kenji Matsuno,et al.  Notch signaling. , 1995, Science.

[9]  Geoffrey M. Clarke,et al.  The genetic basis of developmental stability. I: Relationships between stability, heterozygosity and genomic coadaptation , 1993 .

[10]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Diazinon resistance in Lucilia cuprina; mapping of a fitness modifier , 1987, Heredity.

[11]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Fitness and Asymmetry Modification as an Evolutionary Process A Study in the Australian Sheep Blowfly, Lucilia cuprina and Drosophila melanogaster , 1990 .

[12]  S. Artavanis-Tsakonas,et al.  Notch Signaling : Cell Fate Control and Signal Integration in Development , 1999 .

[13]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Genotype, environment and the asymmetry phenotype. Dieldrin-resistance in Lucilia cuprina (the Australian sheep blowfly) , 1995, Heredity.

[14]  J. A. Mckenzie,et al.  Environmental and Genetic Effects on the Asymmetry Phenotype : Diazinon Resistance in the Australian Sheep Blowfly , Lucilia cuprim , 2002 .

[15]  K. W. Dufour,et al.  Estimation of organism-wide asymmetry in red-winged blackbirds and its relation to studies of mate selection , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  A. Palmer.  Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer , 1994 .

[17]  J. Koella,et al.  Virulence, parasite mode of transmission, and host fluctuating asymmetry , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. H. Graham,et al.  Effects of lead and benzene on the developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster , 1993, Ecotoxicology.

[19]  P. Brakefield,et al.  The genetical basis of fluctuating asymmetry for developmentally integrated traits in a butterfly eyespot pattern , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  A. M. Arias,et al.  A functional analysis of Notch mutations in Drosophila. , 1997, Genetics.

[21]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A STUDY OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY , 1962 .

[22]  G. M. Clarke,et al.  Diazinon resistance, fluctuating asymmetry and fitness in the Australian sheep blowfly, lucilia cuprina. , 1988, Genetics.

[23]  G. M. Clarke,et al.  Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly; a result of canalizing natural selection , 1987, Nature.

[24]  J. A. Mckenzie.  Stress and asymmetry during arrested development of the Australian sheep blowfly , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  P. Simpson,et al.  The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila , 1991, Cell.

[26]  M. W. Young,et al.  Further evidence for function of the Drosophila Notch protein as a transmembrane receptor. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Carl Freeman,et al.  Directional asymmetry and the measurement of developmental instability , 1998 .

[28]  G. Meffe,et al.  SINGLE‐ AND MULTIPLE‐LOCUS GENOTYPES AND LIFE‐HISTORY RESPONSES OF GAMBUSIA HOLBROOKI REARED AT TWO TEMPERATURES , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M. Polák.  Parasites increase fluctuating asymmetry of male Drosophila nigrospiracula: implications for sexual selection , 1993 .

[30]  A. Palmer,et al.  Waltzing with Asymmetry , 1996 .

[31]  Therese A. Markow,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology and Developmental Instability , 1995 .

[32]  D. P. Swain.  A Problem with the Use of Meristic Characters to Estimate Developmental Stability , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[33]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns , 1986 .

[34]  L. Leamy.  Is developmental stability heritable? , 1997 .

[35]  A. Palmer.  Waltzing with Asymmetry Is fluctuating asymmetry a powerful new tool for biologists or just an alluring new dance step , 1996 .