Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements

In this study we investigated the reference frames used to plan arm movements. Specifically, we asked whether the body axis, visual cues and graviception can each play a role in defining "up" and "down" in the planning and execution of movements along the vertical axis. Horizontal and vertical pointing movements were tested in two postures (upright and reclined) and two visual conditions (with and without vision) to identify possible effects of each of these cues on kinematics of movement. Movements were recorded using an optical 3D tracking system and analysis was conducted on velocity profiles of the hand. Despite a major effect of gravity, our analysis shows an effect of the movement direction with respect to the body axis when subjects were reclined with eyes closed. These results suggest that our CNS takes into account multimodal information about vertical in order to compute an optimal motor command that anticipates the effects of gravity.

[1]  H. Nagasaki.  Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Ludovic Marin,et al.  Contribution of Somesthetic Information to the Perception of Body Orientation in the Pitch Dimension , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Rothwell.  Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[4]  M. Nagai,et al.  Larger forward memory displacement in the direction of gravity , 2002 .

[5]  Claire Leconte,et al.  The plasticity of gravitational reference frame and the subjective vertical: Peripheral visual information affects the oblique effect , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Arm end-point trajectories under normal and micro-gravity environments. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[8]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[9]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Does the brain model Newton's laws? , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  M Lipshits,et al.  Gravity affects the preferred vertical and horizontal in visual perception of orientation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[11]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Interaction of eye-, head-, and trunk-bound information in spatial perception and control. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[12]  V. Nougier,et al.  Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  T. Hubbard.  Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Brian L Day,et al.  Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative role of visual and non-visual cues in determining the direction of "up": experiments in the York tilted room facility. , 2003, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[17]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  J E Zacher,et al.  The relative role of visual and non-visual cues in determining the perceived direction of "up": experiments in parabolic flight. , 2005, Acta astronautica.

[19]  C. Papaxanthis,et al.  Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field , 2007, Neuroscience.

[20]  J. McIntyre,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity , 2005, Neuroscience.