Bioactive Glasses in Periodontal Regeneration A Systematic Review.

Bioactive glasses (BAG) are surface-active ceramic materials that can be used in bone regeneration due to their known osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. This systematic review aimed to study the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using BAGs in periodontal regeneration. The selected studies were collected from PubMed and Web of Science databases and included clinical studies investigating the use of BAGs on periodontal bone defect augmentation between January 2000 and February 2022. The identified studies were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 115 full-length peer-reviewed articles were identified. After excluding duplicate articles between the databases and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 studies were selected. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess the selected studies. Five studies compared using BAG with open flap debridement (OFD) without grafting materials. Two of the selected studies were performed to compare the use of BAG with protein-rich-fibrin, one of which also included an additional OFD group. Also, one study evaluated BAG with biphasic calcium phosphate and used a third OFD group. The remaining six studies compared BAG filler with hydroxyapatite, demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, autogenous cortical bone graft, calcium sulphate -hemihydrate, enamel matrix derivatives, and guided tissue regeneration. This systematic review showed that using BAG to treat periodontal bone defects has beneficial effects on periodontal tissue regeneration.

[1]  L. Hupa,et al.  Bioactive glass air-abrasion promotes healing around contaminated implant surfaces surrounded by circumferential bone defects: An experimental study in the rat. , 2023, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[2]  J. Roether,et al.  Bioactive Glass Applications: A Literature Review of Human Clinical Trials , 2021, Materials.

[3]  L. Hupa,et al.  Effect of bioactive glass air-abrasion on Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formed on moderately rough titanium surface. , 2021, European journal of oral sciences.

[4]  E. Könönen,et al.  Periodontitis: A Multifaceted Disease of Tooth-Supporting Tissues , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[5]  Enrica Verne,et al.  Production and characterization of glass-ceramic materials for potential use in dental applications: thermal and mechanical properties, microstructure, and in vitro bioactivity , 2017 .

[6]  K. Yeung,et al.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.

[7]  S. Jensen,et al.  Complications related to bone augmentation procedures of localized defects in the alveolar ridge. A retrospective clinical study , 2016, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

[8]  S. Nares,et al.  Periodontal regeneration - intrabony defects: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. , 2015, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  M. Dard,et al.  Experimental Model for Bone Regeneration in Oral and Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery , 2014, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[10]  A. Polychronopoulou,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative in intrabony defects: prognostic parameters of clinical and radiographic treatment outcomes. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  N. Karimbux,et al.  An evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal defects: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  Y. Chang,et al.  Effects of platelet-rich fibrin on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts and application for periodontal infrabony defects. , 2011, Australian dental journal.

[13]  L. Trombelli,et al.  Single flap approach with and without guided tissue regeneration and a hydroxyapatite biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  S. Gupta,et al.  A comparative evaluation of biphasic calcium phosphate material and bioglass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects: a clinical and radiological study. , 2010, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  G. Marshall,et al.  Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  J. Albandar,et al.  Enamel Matrix Derivative Versus Bioactive Ceramic Filler in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects: 12‐Month Results , 2009 .

[17]  J. Albandar,et al.  Bioactive ceramic filler in the treatment of severe osseous defects: 12-month results. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  L. Trombelli,et al.  Effect of autogenous cortical bone particulate in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  The story of Bioglass® , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[20]  T. Deliberador,et al.  Autogenous bone graft with or without a calcium sulfate barrier in the treatment of Class II furcation defects: a histologic and histometric study in dogs. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  D. Albayrak,et al.  Comparison of platelet pellet and bioactive glass in periodontal regenerative therapy , 2006, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[22]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: scientific evidence and clinical experience. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  D. Cochran,et al.  Amelogenin is a Cell Adhesion Protein , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[24]  L. Hench,et al.  Evaluation of Bioglass/dextran composite as a bone graft substitute. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[25]  H. Newman,et al.  Particulate Bioglass reduces the viability of bacterial biofilms formed on its surface in an in vitro model. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  I. Moon,et al.  Effects of pretreatment clinical parameters on bioactive glass implantation in intrabony periodontal defects. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  Bioactive glass granules for regeneration of human periodontal defects. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[28]  D. M. Burns,et al.  Cytostatic action of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) on human oral squamous cell carcinoma-derived SCC25 epithelial cells. , 2000, Journal of periodontal research.

[29]  N. Lang,et al.  Generalizability of the added benefits of guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. Evaluation in a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial. , 1998 .

[30]  U. Wikesjö,et al.  Effect of a calcium sulfate implant with calcium sulfate barrier on periodontal healing in 3-wall intrabony defects in dogs. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  D. Cochran,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[32]  S. Froum,et al.  Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. A clinical study. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  E. Söderling,et al.  Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral microorganisms. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[34]  W Becker,et al.  A prospective multi-center study evaluating periodontal regeneration for Class II furcation invasions and intrabony defects after treatment with a bioabsorbable barrier membrane: 1-year results. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  S. Low,et al.  Bioactive ceramics for periodontal treatment: comparative studies in the Patus monkey. , 1992, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[36]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Comparison of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft and porous particulate hydroxyapatite in human periodontal osseous defects. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[37]  E Romberg,et al.  Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[38]  R. McHugh,et al.  A randomized four-years study of periodontal therapy. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[39]  M. Urist,et al.  Bone: Formation by Autoinduction , 1965, Science.

[40]  D. Bhat,et al.  A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nanohydroxyapatite (Sybograf™) versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty (Novabone®) in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Infrabony Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[41]  Patel Mehul,et al.  Immunization status of 12-23 months children of urban Jamnagar , 2014 .

[42]  S. Ivanovski.  Periodontal regeneration. , 2009, Australian dental journal.

[43]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass® , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[44]  R. Mengel,et al.  Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: results of a 12-month clinical and radiological study. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.