Switch to maraviroc with darunavir/r, both QD, in patients with suppressed HIV-1 was well tolerated but virologically inferior to standard antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a randomized trial

Objectives Primary study outcome was absence of treatment failure (virological failure, VF, or treatment interruption) per protocol at week 48. Methods Patients on 3-drug ART with stable HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and CCR5-tropic virus were randomized 1:1 to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd (study arm) or continue current ART (continuation arm). Results In June 2015, 115 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome (56 study, 59 continuation arm). The study was discontinued due to excess of VF in the study arm (7 cases, 12.5%, vs 0 in the continuation arm, p = 0.005). The proportion free of treatment failure was 73.2% in the study and 59.3% in the continuation arm. Two participants in the study and 10 in the continuation arm discontinued therapy due to adverse events (p = 0.030). At VF, no emergent drug resistance was detected. Co-receptor tropism switched to non-R5 in one patient. Patients with VF reported lower adherence and had lower plasma drug levels. Femoral bone mineral density was significantly improved in the study arm. Conclusion Switching to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd in virologically suppressed patients was associated with improved tolerability but was virologically inferior to 3-drug therapy.

[1]  Huldrych F. Günthard,et al.  Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection in Adults: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel , 2018, JAMA.

[2]  G. d’Ettorre,et al.  Treatment simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus maintenance of atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week results from a randomized trial (ATLAS-M) , 2017, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[3]  L. Calza,et al.  Dual Raltegravir-Etravirine Combination as Maintenance Regimen in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-Infected Patients. , 2017, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[4]  A. De Luca,et al.  Simplification to a dual regimen with darunavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine in virologically-suppressed HIV-infected patients. , 2016, The Journal of infection.

[5]  R. Kaiser,et al.  Maraviroc, as a Switch Option, in HIV-1-infected Individuals With Stable, Well-controlled HIV Replication and R5-tropic Virus on Their First Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Plus Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitor Regimen: Week 48 Results of the Randomized, Multicenter MARCH S , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  C. Fichtenbaum,et al.  Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment , 2016, AIDS.

[7]  P. Grant,et al.  Tenofovir and bone health , 2016, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[8]  A. Mocroft,et al.  Is there continued evidence for an association between abacavir usage and myocardial infarction risk in individuals with HIV? A cohort collaboration , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[9]  C. Fichtenbaum,et al.  Less Bone Loss With Maraviroc- Versus Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  J. Navarro,et al.  Dual treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus two nucleos(t)ides in virologically stable patients with HIV-1 (SALT): 48 week results from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[11]  D. Podzamczer,et al.  Dual treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression (OLE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[12]  J. Olalla,et al.  Renal safety of coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine vs other nucleoside analogues in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients aged 50 years or older in Spain: The TRIP study , 2015, HIV clinical trials.

[13]  V. Calvez,et al.  A Very Low Geno2pheno False Positive Rate Is Associated with Poor Viro-Immunological Response in Drug-Naïve Patients Starting a First-Line HAART , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  D. Cooper,et al.  Efficacy and safety of maraviroc vs. efavirenz in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1: 5-year findings , 2014, AIDS.

[15]  M. Ramgopal,et al.  Switching from ritonavir to cobicistat in HIV patients with renal impairment who are virologically suppressed on a protease inhibitor , 2014, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[16]  A. d’Arminio Monforte,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of HIV-1 coreceptor tropism by single and triplicate HIV-1 RNA and DNA sequencing in patients undergoing successful first-line antiretroviral therapy , 2013, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[17]  A. d’Arminio Monforte,et al.  Genotypic testing on HIV-1 DNA as a tool to assess HIV-1 co-receptor usage in clinical practice: results from the DIVA study group , 2013, Infection.

[18]  D. Podzamczer,et al.  Maraviroc Once-Daily Nucleoside Analog-Sparing Regimen in Treatment-Naive Patients: Randomized, Open-Label Pilot Study , 2013, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[19]  J. Ainsworth,et al.  Once daily maraviroc 300 mg or 150 mg in combination with ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800/100 mg. , 2012, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[20]  C. Katlama,et al.  Long-term efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in patients with HIV-1 viral suppression: week 96 results from the MONOI ANRS 136 study. , 2012, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[21]  Richard D Moore,et al.  Viremia copy-years predicts mortality among treatment-naive HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[22]  M. Jensen,et al.  Deep V3 sequencing for HIV type 1 tropism in treatment-naive patients: a reanalysis of the MERIT trial of maraviroc. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[23]  A. Wensing,et al.  European guidelines on the clinical management of HIV-1 tropism testing. , 2011, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[24]  J. Grivel,et al.  Selective transmission of R5 HIV-1 variants: where is the gatekeeper? , 2011, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[25]  G. Fätkenheuer,et al.  Two-Year Safety and Virologic Efficacy of Maraviroc in Treatment-Experienced Patients With CCR5-Tropic HIV-1 Infection: 96-Week Combined Analysis of MOTIVATE 1 and 2 , 2010, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[26]  A. De Luca,et al.  Asymmetry of the regimen is correlated to self-reported suboptimal adherence: results from AdUCSC, a cohort study on adherence in Italy. , 2010, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[27]  M. Prosperi,et al.  Comparative determination of HIV-1 co-receptor tropism by Enhanced Sensitivity Trofile, gp120 V3-loop RNA and DNA genotyping , 2010, Retrovirology.

[28]  A. Wu,et al.  Self‐Reported Symptoms and Medication Side Effects Influence Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Persons With HIV Infection , 2001, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[29]  J. J. Henning,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, January 28, 2000 , 1998, HIV clinical trials.

[30]  G. d’Ettorre,et al.  Simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine versus maintaining atazanavir/ritonavir+2NRTIs in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients: 96-week data of the ATLAS-M trial , 2016 .