The measurement properties of the role conflict and role ambiguity scales: A review and extension of the empirical research

The measurement properties of the Rizzo, House and Lirtzman (1970) role conflict and role ambiguity scales have been debated in the research literature for several years. The criticisms are that the scales do not measure separate constructs and are contaminated by method variance. However, some researchers have presented evidence supporting the scales' continued use as independent measures. We attempted to clarify the running debate by re-examining these issues and presenting additional data, which focused on the item level of analysis. Using confirmatory factor analyses and item statistics, we show discriminant validity for the role conflict and ambiguity scales across three diverse samples of workers. We also contend that the evidence for method bias is not as strong as previously argued.

[1]  Lane Tracy,et al.  What do the role conflict and role ambiguity scales measure , 1981 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[3]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Item Content Versus Item Wording: Disentangling Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity , 1990 .

[4]  Carl E. Ferguson,et al.  Role conflict and role ambiguity: Do the scales measure these two constructs? , 1989 .

[5]  A. Bedeian,et al.  A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[6]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  A role and expectancy model of participative decision-making: A replication and theoretical extension , 1990 .

[7]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Role conflict and ambiguity scales: Reality or artifacts? , 1983 .

[8]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[9]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[10]  Mark W. Johnston,et al.  Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework , 1990 .

[11]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity: A Critical Assessment of Construct Validity , 1990 .

[12]  K. Jöreskog.  Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[13]  T. Beehr,et al.  Relationship of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: higher order needs as a moderator. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  J. Tisak,et al.  Psychometric equivalence of a translated circadian rhythm questionnaire: implications for between- and within-population assessments. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  John Schmid,et al.  The development of hierarchical factor solutions , 1957 .

[16]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[17]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Toward a Career-Based Theory of Job Involvement: A Study of Scientists and Engineers. , 1977 .