Automatic Detection of Trustworthiness of the Face: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study

Recognizing intentions of strangers from facial cues is crucial in everyday social interactions. Recent studies demonstrated enhanced event-related potential (ERP) responses to untrustworthy compared to trustworthy faces. The aim of the present study was to investigate the electrophysiological correlates of automatic processing of trustworthiness cues in a visual oddball paradigm in two consecutive experimental blocks. In one block, frequent trustworthy (p = 0.9) and rare untrustworthy face stimuli (p = 0.1) were briefly presented on a computer screen with each stimulus consisting of four peripherally positioned faces. In the other block stimuli were presented with reversed probabilities enabling the comparison of ERPs evoked by physically identical deviant and standard stimuli. To avoid attentional effects participants engaged in a central detection task. Analyses of deviant minus standard difference waveforms revealed that deviant untrustworthy but not trustworthy faces elicited the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) component. The present results indicate that adaptation occurred to repeated unattended trustworthy (but not untrustworthy) faces, i.e., an automatic expectation was elicited towards trustworthiness signals, which was violated by deviant untrustworthy faces. As an evolutionary adaptive mechanism, the observed fast detection of trustworthiness-related social facial cues may serve as the basis of conscious recognition of reliable partners.

[1]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[2]  J. Flegr,et al.  Trustworthy-Looking Face Meets Brown Eyes , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  A. Todorov,et al.  EvaluaTiNg faCES ON TruSTwOrThiNESS afTEr miNimal TimE ExpOSurE , 2009 .

[4]  Qi Wu,et al.  Effects of the duration of expressions on the recognition of microexpressions , 2012, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[5]  Karen L. Schmidt,et al.  Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  Paul D. Kieffaber,et al.  Measuring affective reactivity in individuals with autism spectrum personality traits using the visual mismatch negativity event-related brain potential , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Nick Chater,et al.  Unfakeable Facial Configurations Affect Strategic Choices in Trust Games with or without Information about Past Behavior , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  István Czigler,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Piia Astikainen,et al.  The human brain processes visual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  E. Gordon,et al.  A Temporal Dissociation of Subliminal versus Supraliminal Fear Perception: An Event-related Potential Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Polich Detection of change : event-related potential and fMRI findings , 2003 .

[12]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[13]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[14]  Lun Zhao,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[15]  István Czigler,et al.  Processing of unattended facial emotions: A visual mismatch negativity study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Lun Zhao,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions under non-attentional condition , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences , 2011, Neuroreport.

[18]  Piia Astikainen,et al.  This Reprint May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Detail. Event-related Potentials to Task-irrelevant Changes in Facial Expressions Behavioral and Brain Functions Event-related Potentials to Task-irrelevant Changes in Facial Expressions , 2022 .

[19]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Unintentional temporal context-based prediction of emotional faces: an electrophysiological study. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  I. Hernádi,et al.  The telltale face: possible mechanisms behind defector and cooperator recognition revealed by emotional facial expression metrics. , 2012, British journal of psychology.

[23]  C. F. Bond,et al.  The Kernel of Truth in Judgments of Deceptiveness , 1994 .

[24]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Temporal dynamics of trustworthiness perception , 2012, Brain Research.

[25]  István Czigler,et al.  Automatic prediction error responses to hands with unexpected laterality: An electrophysiological study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  István Czigler,et al.  Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[27]  M. Cincotta,et al.  Trust at first sight: evidence from ERPs. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[28]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[30]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  Modulation of Face-sensitive Event-related Potentials by Canonical and Distorted Human Faces: The Role of Vertical Symmetry and Up-Down Featural Arrangement , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Pierre Fonlupt,et al.  Brain correlates of automatic visual change detection , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  L. Fleischer Telling Lies Clues To Deceit In The Marketplace Politics And Marriage , 2016 .

[33]  Paula Pazo-Álvarez,et al.  Effects of stimulus location on automatic detection of changes in motion direction in the human brain , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  Stefan Berti,et al.  The attentional blink demonstrates automatic deviance processing in vision , 2011, Neuroreport.

[35]  A Zahavi,et al.  The fallacy of conventional signalling. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  Charlotte Stagg,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity: the detection of stimulus change , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  G. Stefanics,et al.  Visual Mismatch Negativity Reveals Automatic Detection of Sequential Regularity Violation , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Cody Ding,et al.  An ERP study on the time course of facial trustworthiness appraisal , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  David H. Ledbetter,et al.  Human Preferences for Symmetry: Subjective Experience, Cognitive Conflict and Cortical Brain Activity , 2012, PloS one.