Post-concussion symptoms and disability in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Studies investigating long-term symptoms and disability after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have yielded mixed results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported post-concussion symptoms (PCS) and disability following mTBI. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PsycInfo to identify inception cohort studies of adults with mTBI. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We identified 43 eligible studies for the systematic review; 41 were rated as high risk of bias, primarily due to high attrition (>20%). Twenty-one studies (49%) were included in the meta-analyses (5 studies were narratively synthesized; 17 studies were duplicate reports). At 3-6 months post-injury, the estimated prevalence of PCS from random-effects meta-analyses was 31.3% (95% CI=25.4-38.4) using a lenient definition of PCS (2-4 mild severity PCS) and 18.3% (95% CI=13.6-24.0) using a more stringent definition. The estimated prevalence of disability was 54.0% (95% CI=49.4-58.6) and 29.6% (95% CI=27.8-31.5) when defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended <8 and <7, respectively. The prevalence of symptoms similar to PCS was higher in adults with mTBI versus orthopedic injury (prevalence ratio=1.57, 95% CI=1.22-2.02). In a meta-regression, attrition rate was the only study-related factor significantly associated with higher estimated prevalence of PCS. Setting attrition to 0%, the estimated prevalence of PCS (lenient definition) was 16.1%. We conclude that nearly 1 in 3 adults who present to an emergency department or trauma centre with mTBI report at least mild severity PCS 3-6 months later, but controlling for attrition bias, the true prevalence may be 1 in 6. Studies with representative samples and high retention rates are needed. Keywords: traumatic brain injury; head trauma; adult brain injury.

[1]  Masoomeh Nazemi-Rafi,et al.  Persistence of post-concussion symptoms in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and no psychiatric history in the emergency department , 2020, Brain injury.

[2]  V. Welch,et al.  Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline , 2020, BMJ.

[3]  Jeannie-Marie S. Leoutsakos,et al.  Age differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: results from the HeadSMART study , 2020, International review of psychiatry.

[4]  K. Gordon.  The Silent Minority: Insights into Who Fails to Present for Medical Care Following a Brain Injury , 2019, Neuroepidemiology.

[5]  J. Haagsma,et al.  The association between post-concussion symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. , 2019, Injury.

[6]  R. Pearse,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to work after mild Traumatic brain injury , 2018, Brain injury.

[7]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Temporal lobe contusions on computed tomography are associated with impaired 6-month functional recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study , 2018, Neurological research.

[8]  G. Manley,et al.  Sub-classifying patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A clustering approach based on baseline clinical characteristics and 90-day and 180-day outcomes , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  A. Bartfai,et al.  Emotional reserve and prolonged post-concussive symptoms and disability: a Swedish prospective 1-year mild traumatic brain injury cohort study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[10]  N. Lannin,et al.  Persistent symptoms and activity changes three months after mild traumatic brain injury , 2018, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[11]  G. Hageman,et al.  Outpatient follow-up after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the UPFRONT-study , 2017, Brain injury.

[12]  M. Zonfrillo,et al.  Emergency department visits for head trauma in the United States , 2016, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[13]  G. Iverson,et al.  Clinical correlates of retrograde amnesia in mild traumatic brain injury , 2015, Brain injury.

[14]  D. Broshek,et al.  A review of post-concussion syndrome and psychological factors associated with concussion , 2015, Brain injury.

[15]  R. Kane,et al.  S-100β does not predict outcome after mild traumatic brain injury , 2014, Brain injury.

[16]  J. S. Skouen,et al.  Missing a follow-up after mild traumatic brain injury—Does it matter? , 2014, Brain injury.

[17]  G. Larrabee,et al.  Meta-Analytic Methods and the Importance of Non-TBI Factors Related to Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Response to Bigler et al. (2013) , 2013, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[18]  I. Baguley,et al.  The prospective course of postconcussion syndrome: the role of mild traumatic brain injury. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[19]  R. Riopelle,et al.  Emergency department prediction of post-concussive syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury—an international cross-validation study , 2011, Brain injury.

[20]  R. Riley,et al.  Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J. Borg,et al.  Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.