Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients.

Previous studies have shown that far space can be remapped as near when reached by a stick that artificially prolongs the participants' personal space. In the present study, the authors asked whether a similar remapping occurs when far space is reached not by using a tool but by locomotion. Neglect patients showed more severe neglect in far than in near space in bisection tasks executed from different distances either by pointing to a target line with a projection light pen or by walking across the line. A kinematic study of the walking performance of one of those neglect patients showed that, contrary to the prediction of remapping during locomotion, the walking trajectories were rectilinear. The authors interpreted these results as evidence that in their patients-at least for short, linear trajectories-no remapping of space took place during locomotion. The location of far objects was coded at the beginning of the movement, and the error in the bisection computation was generated within the 1st representation that was activated.

[1]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Seeing where your hands are , 1997, Nature.

[2]  A. Cowey,et al.  Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 1988, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage , 1996, Neuroreport.

[6]  A. Cowey,et al.  Visual field defects after frontal eye-field lesions in monkeys. , 1971, Brain research.

[7]  A. Cowey,et al.  No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. , 1996 .

[9]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Pierluigi Zoccolotti,et al.  Influence of the radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  T. Mulder,et al.  WALKING THROUGH DOORWAYS - AN ANALYSIS OF NAVIGATION SKILLS IN PATIENTS WITH NEGLECT , 1995 .

[14]  L. Diller,et al.  Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[15]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Walking trajectory and hand movements in unilateral left neglect: A vestibular hypothesis , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  W. J. Nowack Neurobiology of Neocortex , 1989, Neurology.

[17]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[18]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[19]  J. Marshall,et al.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.

[20]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  F. Bremmer,et al.  Spatial invarianceof visual receptivefields inparietal cortexneurons , 1997 .

[22]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  C. Gross,et al.  The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons , 1995 .

[25]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons , 1988, Nature.

[26]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[27]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Elite: A Digital Dedicated Hardware System for Movement Analysis Via Real-Time TV Signal Processing , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  T Landis,et al.  Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[29]  Giuseppe di Pellegrino,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[31]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  K M Heilman,et al.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.