Groundwater Management Using Model Reduction via Empirical Orthogonal Functions

This work presents a novel approach for solving groundwater management problems with reduced computational effort. We replace a groundwater flow model governed by a partial differential equation with a simple model governed by an ordinary differential equation. Model reduction is achieved with empirical orthogonal functions, i.e., principal components. Replacement of the full-scale model by a reduced model allows implementation of the embedding approach for optimal groundwater management. Comparing the results obtained with the full-scale simulation model, preliminary analyses show that the reduced model is able to reproduce head variations in the flow domain with good accuracy and, to a certain degree, the sensitivities of head with respect to pumping. A key advantage of the reduced model is that it is simple and easy to solve, and in many instances captures the dominating characteristics of the original model. In view of the many sources of uncertainty influencing groundwater simulation, the accuracy provided by a reduced model may be sufficient for planning purposes. As with other examples of model reduction presented in recent research efforts, the methodology shows promise in presenting general trends, but does not eliminate the need for the original model when more detailed analyses are needed.

[1]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  COMPUTER ASSISTED NEGOTIATION OF MULTIOBJECTIVE WATER RESOURCES CONFLICTS1 , 1992 .

[2]  Tracy Nishikawa,et al.  Evaluation of the Source and Transport of High Nitrate Concentrations in Ground Water, Warren Subbasin, California , 2003 .

[3]  Amy B. Chan Hilton,et al.  Groundwater Remediation Design under Uncertainty Using Genetic Algorithms , 2005 .

[4]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Aquifer parameter identification with optimum dimension in parameterization , 1981 .

[5]  Manoutchehr Heidari,et al.  Applications of Optimal Hydraulic Control to Ground-Water Systems , 1994 .

[6]  Thomas Maddock,et al.  Algebraic technological function from a simulation model , 1972 .

[7]  Arnold Heemink,et al.  Reduced models for linear groundwater flow models using empirical orthogonal functions , 2004 .

[8]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[9]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for sustainable groundwater management in semiarid regions , 2004 .

[10]  William W.-G. Yeh Optimal identification of parameters in an inhomogeneous medium with quadratic programming , 1975 .

[11]  W. Alley Regression Approximations for Transport Model Constraint Sets in Combined Aquifer Simulation-Optimization Studies , 1986 .

[12]  B. Wagner Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling (95RG00394) , 1995 .

[13]  H. Park,et al.  Estimation of parameters in flow reactors using the Karhunen-Loève decomposition , 1998 .

[14]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Methods and Guidelines for Effective Model Calibration , 2000 .

[15]  David P. Ahlfeld,et al.  Conjunctive-management models for sustained yield of stream-aquifer systems , 2003 .

[16]  Virginia M. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of Neural Network Approximators in Simulation-Optimization , 2000 .

[17]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[18]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Characterization and identification of aquifer heterogeneity with generalized parameterization and Bayesian estimation , 2004 .

[19]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty , 2005 .

[20]  S. J. Press,et al.  Applied Multivariate Analysis. , 1973 .

[21]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Ranking Ground-water Management Alternatives by Multicriterion Analysis , 1994 .

[22]  H. Park,et al.  The use of the Karhunen-Loève decomposition for the modeling of distributed parameter systems , 1996 .

[23]  R. Peralta,et al.  Integrated embedding optimization applied to Salt Lake Valley aquifers , 1994 .

[24]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  MULTICRITERION ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT , 1992 .

[25]  W. Yeh,et al.  Identification of parameters in unsteady open channel flows , 1972 .

[26]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Striking the Balance: Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design for Conflicting Objectives , 2004 .

[27]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[28]  Arnold W. Heemink,et al.  Inverse modeling of groundwater flow using model reduction , 2005 .

[29]  W. Yeh Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem , 1986 .

[30]  H. M. Park,et al.  Low dimensional modeling of flow reactors , 1996 .

[31]  W. Yeh,et al.  Optimal observation network design for parameter structure identification in groundwater modeling , 2005 .

[32]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Optimal conjunctive‐use operations and plans , 1998 .

[33]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  A proposed stepwise regression method for model structure identification , 1998 .

[34]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model; user guide to the observation, sensitivity, and parameter-estimation processes and three post-processing programs , 2000 .

[35]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR CONJUNCTIVE USE OF COASTAL SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER , 1998 .

[36]  Leon S. Lasdon,et al.  GROUP DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING USING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[37]  S. Gorelick A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods , 1983 .

[38]  S. Ranjithan,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem , 1994 .

[39]  L. Feyen,et al.  Reliable groundwater management in hydroecologically sensitive areas , 2004 .