A tool based approach to checking logical consistency in accident reports

Abstract In this paper, we present a technique to analyse consistency in accident reports. This is achieved using the prototype verification system. The relevant evidence and the rules for normal behaviour are coded as axioms. These axioms are then used to identify the cause of the accident. The key aspect of our work is to describe the system using a notion of states and state predicates. We show that our technique can be used in conjunction with other formal methods used to analyse accident reports.

[1]  R.W. Butler,et al.  A formal methods approach to the analysis of mode confusion , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[2]  Sérgio Vale Aguiar Campos,et al.  Symbolic Model Checking , 1993, CAV.

[3]  Natarajan Shankar,et al.  Abstract and Model Check While You Prove , 1999, CAV.

[4]  Jorge Cuéllar Formal Methods in an Industrial Environment , 1998, CAV.

[5]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  The temporal logic of actions , 1994, TOPL.

[6]  Chris W. Johnson,et al.  PII: S0951-8320(99)00066-6 , 1999 .

[7]  Chris W. Johnson,et al.  A formal and structured approach to the use of task analysis in accident modelling , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Marieke Huisman,et al.  A Comparison of PVS and Isabelle/HOL , 1998, TPHOLs.