Variability in category learning: The Effect of Context Change and Item Variation on Knowledge Generalization

We explore how context change and item variation during natural category learning influence memory and generalization to new examples. Participants studied either images of the same bird or varied birds from each of several categories. These images could be presented in a constant background color or different background colors. During test, birds were presented in only one of the studied background colors. Performance at test depended on the context overlap between study and test, with better performance when there was minimal context change during study. Also, contrary to previous findings, we found that learners generalized better when items were repeated during study and remembered old items better when items were varied during study. When there is a moderate degree of context change, there is no benefit of repetition or variation for either novel or old items. These results indicate that context change and item variation have complementary effects on learning.

[1]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[2]  Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al.  Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  How does knowledge promote memory? The distinctiveness theory of skilled memory. , 2008 .

[4]  D. Homa.  Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype , 1973 .

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Steven M. Smith.  Remembering In and Out of Context , 1979 .

[7]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  Contextual Enrichment and Distribution of Practice in the Classroom , 1984 .

[8]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  H. V. Restorff.  Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld , 1933 .

[10]  Steven M. Smith.  Effects of Environmental Context on Human Memory , 2014 .

[11]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When does context influence recognition memory , 1980 .

[12]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[13]  E. Abernethy,et al.  The Effect of Changed Environmental Conditions Upon the Results of College Examinations , 1940 .

[14]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[15]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[16]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concepts and Categorization , 2003 .

[17]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[18]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  Effects of category diversity on learning, memory, and generalization , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[19]  W. H. Saufley,et al.  Context effects: Classroom tests and context independence , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Effects of similarity on environmental context cueing , 2014, Memory.

[21]  Bridgid Finn,et al.  Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[22]  Nick Chater,et al.  The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Effects of varied and constant environmental contexts on acquisition and retention. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  S. R. Schmidt.  Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Modeling Distinctiveness: Implications for General Memory Theory , 2006 .