Robustness evaluation of RC frame buildings to progressive collapse

Abstract A new procedure derived from non-linear static and dynamic analyses is proposed for comparing the relative robustness of RC frame buildings against progressive collapse. The methodology offers a formal way to assess the collapse resistance of structures following the sudden loss of one or more vertical load carrying member/s. The novelty of the proposed methodology lies in the sequential dynamic + static procedure that tracks the redistribution of axial forces following each critical column removal. The basic tool used in the procedure is the “pushdown” analysis, which permits estimation of the residual strength in the structure after it has been damaged by the loss of a critical vertical element. The proposed procedure identifies the critical sequence of column removals and is central to the methodology and the definition of the robustness indices. Referred to as Local Robustness Evaluation (LRE), the methodology is used to develop two robustness indices and applied to two buildings to demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedure in providing a basis for comparing their resistance to progressive collapse.

[1]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Assemblies under Column-Removal Scenario , 2014 .

[2]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Assessment of Progressive Collapse Residual Capacity using Pushdown Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[4]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework , 2008 .

[5]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse-Resistant Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures , 2008 .

[6]  Uwe Starossek,et al.  Typology of progressive collapse , 2007 .

[7]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Meng-Hao Tsai,et al.  Evaluation of different loading simulation approaches for progressive collapse analysis of regular building frames , 2012 .

[9]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  On the assessment of robustness , 2008 .

[10]  Youpo Su,et al.  Progressive Collapse Resistance of Axially-Restrained Frame Beams , 2009 .

[11]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Dynamics of 3-D co-rotational beams , 1997 .

[12]  Gary F. Panariello,et al.  Study of Mitigation Strategies for Progressive Collapse of a Reinforced Concrete Commercial Building , 2006 .

[13]  David I Blockley,et al.  Vulnerability of structural systems , 2003 .

[14]  Guoqing Xu,et al.  An energy-based partial pushdown analysis procedure for assessment of disproportionate collapse potential , 2011 .

[15]  John Vantomme,et al.  Investigation of the influence of design and material parameters in the progressive collapse analysis of RC structures , 2011 .

[16]  Yihai Bao,et al.  Simplified progressive collapse simulation of RC frame–wall structures , 2010 .

[17]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Testing and Analysis of Steel and Concrete Beam-Column Assemblies under a Column Removal Scenario , 2011 .

[18]  Marlon Bazan,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Progressive Collapse Evaluation of Actual Reinforced Concrete Structure , 2007 .

[19]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Macromodel-Based Simulation of Progressive Collapse: Steel Frame Structures , 2008 .