Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision

People with central-field loss must use peripheral vision for reading. Previous studies have shown that reading performance in peripheral vision can improve with extensive practice on a trigram letter-recognition task. The present study compared training on this task with training on two other character-based tasks (lexical-decision and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) reading) which might plausibly produce more improvement in peripheral reading speed. Twenty-eight normally-sighted young adults were trained at 10 degrees in the lower visual field in a pre/post design. All three training methods produced significant improvements in reading speed, with average gains of 39% for lexical-decision, 54% for trigram letter-recognition, and 72% for RSVP training. Although the RSVP training was most effective, the lexical-decision task has the advantage of easy self administration making it more practical for home-based training.

[1]  D. Scott.  Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[2]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  E Peli,et al.  Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  C. Frennesson,et al.  Location and Stability of a Newly Established Eccentric Retinal Locus Suitable for Reading, Achieved through Training of Patients with a Dense Central Scotoma , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  Andrew T. Sabin,et al.  Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough? , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Fahle.  Perceptual learning: a case for early selection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[8]  R A Schuchard,et al.  Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[10]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  E. Mehr,et al.  Training and Practice Effects in Performance with Low‐Vision Aids: A Preliminary Study , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[13]  Timothy McMahon,et al.  Eye-movement training for reading in patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[15]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[16]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading speed in the peripheral visual field of older adults: Does it benefit from perceptual learning? , 2010, Vision Research.

[19]  U. Leonards,et al.  Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Preneural limitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  G. Legge,et al.  Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of MNREAD data. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Principles of modern low vision rehabilitation. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[23]  J. G. Strong,et al.  Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  G. Legge,et al.  Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? , 2003, Vision Research.

[25]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view , 2006, Vision Research.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  C. Frennesson,et al.  Patients with AMD and a large absolute central scotoma can be trained successfully to use eccentric viewing, as demonstrated in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 2003, Vision Research.

[29]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[30]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  J. A. Kraut,et al.  Clinical Low Vision , 1985 .

[32]  M. Fahle,et al.  The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task , 1997, Vision Research.

[33]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[34]  E. Crook,et al.  Word Recognition , 2010 .

[35]  Alex R Bowers,et al.  Short-Term In-Office Practice Improves Reading Performance with Stand Magnifiers for People with AMD , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[36]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  A. Baron,et al.  Response slowing of older adults: effects of time-limit contingencies on single- and dual-task performances. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[38]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[39]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[40]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[41]  J. Mcdowd,et al.  The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[42]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Modeling perceptual learning: difficulties and how they can be overcome , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[43]  Hye-Won Lee,et al.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention? , 2010, Journal of vision.