Hand bone loss measured by digital X-ray radiogrammetry is a predictor of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether loss of bone measured by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) of hands early in the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may predict future radiographic joint damage after 1 and 2 years. Methods: A total of 166 patients with early RA, who were part of the Better Anti-Rheumatic FarmacOTherapy (BARFOT) low-dose prednisolone study, were included. The patients had been randomized to treatment with 7.5 mg prednisolone daily or no prednisolone when they started with their first disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. Radiographs of hands and feet were taken at baseline and after 1 and 2 years and assessed by the van der Heijde modified Sharp (vdH-S) score. Hand bone density (HBD) was measured on the same radiographs by DXR. Changes in HBD and hand bone loss (HBL) were calculated. HBL was defined as a change in DXR bone mineral density (DXR-BMD) during the first year by more than 0.0048 g/cm2. Results: HBL was found in 64% of the patients. Patients with HBL had radiological progression significantly more often than patients without (80% vs. 57%, p=0.012). Patients not treated with prednisolone had HBL more often than patients with this treatment (83% vs. 44%, p=0.001). In multiple regression analyses, HBL and change in DXR-BMD during the first year proved to be independent predictors of radiological progression. Conclusions: Loss of bone measured by DXR was found to be an independent predictor of radiological joint damage and may thus be an additional tool in the process of treatment decision in early RA.

[1]  G. Haugeberg,et al.  Adalimumab therapy reduces hand bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis: explorative analyses from the PREMIER study , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  Y. Goekoop-Ruiterman,et al.  Changes in hand and generalised bone mineral density in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Cortical hand bone loss after 1 year in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts radiographic hand joint damage at 5-year and 10-year follow-up , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  C. Wijbrandts,et al.  Responsiveness to anti-TNFα therapy is related to pre-treatment tissue inflammation levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients , 2007 .

[5]  G. Haugeberg,et al.  Hand bone loss as an outcome measure in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year observational study comparing cortical and total bone loss , 2007, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[6]  A. Boonen,et al.  Low-dose prednisolone in addition to the initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis reduces joint destruction and increases the remission rate: a two-year randomized trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  P. Emery,et al.  Value of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a diagnostic and assessment tool in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[8]  Jennifer S Gregory,et al.  Bone Shape, Structure, and Density as Determinants of Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Pilot Study Investigating the Combination of Risk Factors , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[9]  J. Kirwan,et al.  Reduced loss of hand bone density with prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  A. Fenton,et al.  The precision of digital X-ray radiogrammetry compared with DXA in subjects with normal bone density or osteoporosis. , 2005, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[11]  A. Malich,et al.  Digital radiogrammetry as a new diagnostic tool for estimation of disease-related osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis compared with pQCT , 2005, Rheumatology International.

[12]  J. Pødenphant,et al.  Comparison of dual X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA), digital X‐ray radiogrammetry (DXR), and conventional radiographs in the evaluation of osteoporosis and bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2005, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[13]  D. Reid,et al.  Predicting erosive disease in rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal study of changes in bone density using digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a pilot study. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[14]  M. Ahlmén,et al.  Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[15]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  W. A. Kaiser,et al.  Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA , 2004, European Radiology.

[17]  J. Pødenphant,et al.  Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital x ray radiogrammetry than dual x ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome , 2003, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  I. Hafström,et al.  Reduced bone mineral density in early rheumatoid arthritis is associated with radiological joint damage at baseline and after 2 years in women. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  J. Adams,et al.  A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  A. Dolan,et al.  Does active treatment of rheumatoid arthritis limit disease-associated bone loss? , 2002, Rheumatology.

[21]  A. Katsaraki,et al.  Clinical course and outcome of early rheumatoid arthritis , 2001, Rheumatology International.

[22]  J. T. Jørgensen,et al.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision. , 2000, Clinical physiology.

[23]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. American Rheumatism Association preliminary remission criteria in relation to the disease activity score. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[24]  Blair Wf,et al.  An approach to complex rheumatoid hand and wrist problems. , 1996 .

[25]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Interobserver variation in the detection of osteopenia by radiography and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine , 1994, Skeletal Radiology.

[26]  A C Brower,et al.  Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The gold standard versus fool's gold. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  F. Arnett.  Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[28]  A. Kalla,et al.  Osteoporosis screening--radiogrammetry revisited. , 1989, British journal of rheumatology.

[29]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  B E NORDIN,et al.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. , 1960, Clinical radiology.

[31]  H. H. Thodberg,et al.  Estimation of Bone Mineral Density by Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry: Theoretical Background and Clinical Testing , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[32]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective followup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[33]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.