Combining Quantitative Methods and Grounded Theory for Researching E-Reverse Auctions

Even though many authors claim that e-reverse auctions (e-RAs) are detrimental to the effective building and management of buyer-supplier relationships (Emiliani and Stec 2004), not much is known about how specific characteristics of e-RAs may contribute to such negative effects on buyer-seller relations (Jap 2003). This study sets out not only to provide a first investigation of context, participants' information behaviour, and buyer-supplier relationships in e-RAs, but also to illustrate new methods for theory building in the e-RA and information systems domain. Following a grounded-theory approach, a comprehensive online questionnaire was developed (Lösch and Lambert 2006) based on the critical review of the literature and the results of a preceding explanatory study (Lösch 2005). Usable responses were received from 89 buyers and 54 suppliers, including both users and non-users of e-RAs. The data were analyzed using a novel approach to quantitative analysis based on suggestions by Glaser (1994). The results indicate that e-RAs have fewer negative effects on buyer-supplier relationships than currently assumed. They also show how context and the participants' information behaviour correlate with buyer-supplier relationships, thus providing first suggestions for a better management of e-RAs. The paper also thus provides a first illustration of how quantitative methodology might be usefully applied to information systems research, an area which is dominated by the use of qualitative methodology.

[1]  M. Emiliani,et al.  Aerospace parts suppliers’ reaction to online reverse auctions , 2004 .

[2]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Purchasing's Role in Environmental Management: Cross-Functional Development of Grounded Theory , 2001 .

[3]  Michelle D. Lane,et al.  Exploring the barriers to the adoption of e‐auctions for sourcing , 2006 .

[4]  Ji Mohr,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior and conflict resolution technique, Strategic Management Journal, January, . , 1994 .

[5]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[6]  Alan Harrison,et al.  Online reverse auctions and their role in buyer–supplier relationships , 2003 .

[7]  Sandy D. Jap Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future , 2002 .

[8]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Reverse auctions--grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective , 2004 .

[9]  Rana Tassabehji,et al.  Reverse e‐auctions and supplier‐buyer relationships: an exploratory study , 2006 .

[10]  Larry R. Smeltzer,et al.  Electronic reverse auctions: Promises, risks and conditions for success , 2003 .

[11]  Philip Powell,et al.  Reflections on information systems practice, education and research: 10 years of the Information Systems Journal , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Adrian Griffiths Trusting an auction , 2003 .

[13]  Andrea Lösch,et al.  E-Reverse Auctions Revisited: An Analysis of Context, Buyer–Supplier Relations and Information Behavior , 2007 .

[14]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Regulating B2B online reverse auctions through voluntary codes of conduct , 2005 .

[15]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Commentary on bReverse auctions for relationship marketersQ by Daly and Nath , 2005 .

[16]  R. Tulder,et al.  Reverse auctions or auctions reversed: First experiments by Philips , 2002 .

[17]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Sourcing in the global aerospace supply chain using online reverse auctions , 2004 .

[18]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Setting the stage for successful electronic reverse auctions , 2004 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .

[20]  C. M. Sashi,et al.  The role of Internet auctions in the expansion of B2B markets , 2002 .

[21]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  Internet reverse auctions: Valuable tool in experienced hands , 2002 .

[22]  M. Emiliani Executive decision‐making traps and B2B online reverse auctions , 2006 .

[23]  Gerhard Reichmann Measuring University Library Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Prithwiraj Nath,et al.  Reverse auctions and buyer–seller relationships: A rejoinder to Emiliani and Stec's commentary , 2005 .

[25]  Prithwiraj Nath,et al.  Reverse auctions for relationship marketers , 2005 .

[26]  Larry R. Smeltzer,et al.  Reverse auctions in industrial marketing and buying , 2002 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .

[28]  Andrew Stein,et al.  The 20% solution?: a case study on the efficacy of reverse auctions , 2003 .

[29]  P. Miranda,et al.  INCORPORATING INVENTORY CONTROL DECISIONS INTO A STRATEGIC DISTRIBUTION NETWORK DESIGN MODEL WITH STOCHASTIC DEMAND , 2004 .

[30]  Robert E. Spekman Perceptions of strategic vulnerability among industrial buyers and its effect on information search and supplier evaluation , 1988 .

[31]  Sandy D. Jap An Exploratory Study of the Introduction of Online Reverse Auctions , 2003 .