Abrupt category shifts during real-time person perception

Previous studies have suggested that real-time person perception relies on continuous competition, in which partially active categories smoothly compete over time. Here, two studies demonstrated the involvement of a different kind of competition. In Study 1, before participants selected the correct sex category for morphed faces, their mouse trajectories often exhibited a continuous attraction toward the incorrect category that increased with sex-category ambiguity, indicating continuous competition. On other trials, however, trajectories initially pursued the incorrect category and then abruptly redirected toward the correct category, suggesting early incorrect category activation that was rapidly reversed later in processing. These abrupt category reversals also increased with ambiguity. In Study 2, participants were presented with faces containing a sex-typical or sex-atypical hair cue, in a context in which the norm was either sex-typical targets (normative context) or sex-atypical targets (counternormative context). Sex-atypical targets induced greater competition in the normative context, but sex-typical targets induced greater competition in the counternormative context. Together, these results demonstrate that categorizing others involves both smooth competition and abrupt category shifts, and that these flexibly adapt to the social context.

[1]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Koen Lamberts,et al.  Categorization under time pressure. , 1995 .

[3]  Jennifer M. Roche,et al.  Exploring Action Dynamics as an Index of Paired-Associate Learning , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[6]  J. Hegdé Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  K. Lamberts Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.

[8]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  Hand Movements Reveal the Time-course of Shape and Pigmentation Processing in Face Categorization , 2022 .

[12]  N. Ambady,et al.  A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. , 2011, Psychological review.

[13]  K. Lamberts Feature sampling in categorization and recognition of objects , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  C. Macrae,et al.  Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  S. Grossberg How does a brain build a cognitive code , 1980 .

[16]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[18]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[19]  C. Macrae,et al.  A boy primed Sue: feature‐based processing and person construal , 2007 .

[20]  E T Rolls,et al.  Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[22]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[23]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race , 2010 .

[24]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Changing your mind: a computational mechanism of vacillation , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition , 1973 .

[26]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  THE PHASE TRANSITION IN HUMAN COGNITION , 2009 .