Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this paper is to compare the accuracy of cephalometric landmark identification using three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) surface rendering with "high-dose" (200 mAs) and "low-dose" (35 mAs) CT protocols. The absorbed dose levels for radiosensitive organs in the maxillofacial region during the exposure for both 3D-CT protocols were also measured. METHODS The study population consisted of 15 human dry skulls examined with spiral 3D-CT. 12 cephalometric anatomical landmarks at 7 sites were identified on the 3D-CT surface renderings by 2 observers independently, twice each, using high-dose and low-dose protocols. In total, 1440 imaging measurements were made. Thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) were placed at ten sites around the thyroid and submandibular glands and the eyes in an Alderson phantom for measuring the absorbed dose levels. RESULTS The intraobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks were smaller for all sites with the high-dose protocol (P = 0.37). There was a significant difference among the observers (P = 0.000004). Interobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks were smaller for four of the seven sites with the low-dose protocol. However, the global interobserver mean distances between 3D landmarks for all sites were smaller with the high-dose protocol (P = 0.028). The low-dose protocol reduced the radiation dose to the thyroid by 6.12, to the submandibular salivary glands by 5.91 and to the eye by 5.44, resulting in a global reduction factor of 5.71. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy in the landmark's identification was maintained when the milliampere-second values were reduced from 200 mAs to 35 mAs. We recommend use of the low-dose protocol for clinical 3D-CT cephalometric applications.

[1]  R Kötter,et al.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  R. Reznek,et al.  The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  E. Wiesen,et al.  Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  I. Zammit-Maempel,et al.  Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  B Macq,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  U. Streubühr,et al.  Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[7]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  K. Harii,et al.  Optimized 3-D CT Scan Protocol for Longitudinal Morphological Estimation in Craniofacial Surgery , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nonparametric Hypotheses and Rank Statistics for Unbalanced Factorial Designs , 1997 .

[13]  C M Craven,et al.  Multispiral three-dimensional computed tomography in the investigation of craniosynostosis: technique optimization. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  H M Pinsky,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  B. Macq,et al.  3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software , 2006, Neuroradiology.

[16]  S E J Connor,et al.  Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.