Learn and play with interactive TV

Despite the criticism concerning the value of TV content, research reveals several worthwhile aspects -- one of them is the opportunity to learn. In this article we explore the characteristics of interactive TV applications that facilitate education and interactive entertainment. In doing so we analyze research methods and empirical results from experimental and field studies. The findings suggest that interactive TV applications provide support for education and entertainment for children and young people, as well as continuous education for all. In particular, interactive TV is especially suitable for (1) informal learning and (2) for engaging and motivating its audience. We conclude with an agenda for future interactive TV research in entertainment and education.

[1]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  The television will be revolutionized: effects of PVRs and filesharing on television watching , 2006, CHI.

[2]  Educating via entertainment media , 2003 .

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services , 1996, CACM.

[4]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  That's Entertainment! Designing Streaming, Multimedia Web Experiences , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Glenda Revelle,et al.  Educating via entertainment media: the Sesame Workshop approach , 2003, CIE.

[6]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  It's all entertainment—sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences , 2001 .

[7]  Leena Eronen.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Data in User Research on Digital Television , 2001 .

[8]  Douglas A. Ferguson.  Profile: Channel repertoire in the presence of remote control devices, VCRs and cable television , 1992 .

[9]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  The Coming of Media Entertainment , 2000 .

[10]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  From Here to Obscurity? Media Substitution Theory and Traditional Media in an On-line World , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment—Education , 2002 .

[12]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  Affective usability evaluation for an interactive music television channel , 2004, CIE.

[13]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. , 2000 .

[14]  Stephen W. Draper,et al.  Analysing fun as a candidate software requirement , 1999, Personal Technologies.

[15]  P. Vorderer.  Interactive entertainment and beyond , 2000 .

[16]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  From here to obscurity?: media substitution theory and traditional media in an on-line world , 2003 .

[17]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  Does Entertainment Suffer From Interactivity? The Impact of Watching an Interactive TV Movie on Viewers' Experience of Entertainment , 2001 .

[18]  John Karat,et al.  That's Entertainment! Designing Streaming, Multimedia Web Experiences , 2002 .

[19]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[20]  E. Rogers,et al.  Entertainment-Education and Social Change: An Analysis of Parasocial Interaction, Social Learning, Collective Efficacy, and Paradoxical Communication. , 2000 .

[21]  Claudia Wallis,et al.  The multitasking generation. , 2006, Time.