Change of facilitation during voluntary bilateral hand activation after stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The relearning of daily activities after stroke also involves performance of bimanual tasks. This raises the possibility that concurrent activation of the healthy hemisphere interferes with reorganization processes in the affected hemisphere due to inhibitory pathways between homologous motor cortex representations. This study investigated the effect of voluntary, simultaneous activation of both hands upon the non-dominant (healthy subjects) or affected (stroke patients) hemisphere. METHODS Eleven healthy subjects and 16 stroke patients were investigated using transcranial stimulation (TMS). TMS was applied over the non-dominant/affected hemisphere during performance of an isometric pinch grip at different force levels (10% or 50% of maximal voluntary contraction) with the contralateral hand. The ipsilateral hand had to perform the pinch grip at various force levels (10%, 50%, or 100% of maximal voluntary contraction) simultaneously. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were compared to assess differences in motor cortex excitability. RESULTS Unilateral activity of either hand alone exerted a facilitatory effect upon the non-dominant or affected hemisphere. In healthy subjects, the activation of the ipsilateral hand simultaneously with the contralateral hand did not produce any significant change of the MEP amplitudes compared to unilateral activation of the contralateral hand. In patients, however, the additional activation of the ipsilateral hand caused an additional increase of the peak-to-peak amplitudes. CONCLUSION In healthy subjects voluntary activation of the ipsilateral hand does not change the excitability of the motor cortex of the non-dominant hemisphere, when the contralateral hand is simultaneously activated. The facilitation of the contralateral hand seems to gate further facilitation by the ipsilateral hand. However, in stroke patients simultaneous activation of both hands causes an additional facilitation compared to activation of the affected hand alone.

[1]  S. Black,et al.  Bilateral movement enhances ipsilesional cortical activity in acute stroke: A pilot functional MRI study , 2001, Neurology.

[2]  Thomas A. Matyas,et al.  Upper Extremity Retraining Following Stroke: Effects of Bilateral Practice , 1996 .

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. , 1990, International disability studies.

[4]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  O. Witte,et al.  Extended brain disinhibition following small photothrombotic lesions in rat frontal cortex , 1997, Neuroreport.

[8]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Hallett,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation during unimanual motor tasks: further evidence for motor dominance , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  W. Byblow,et al.  Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. , 1979, Physiotherapy.

[12]  H. Hummelsheim,et al.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials in hand extensor muscles of stroke patients: correlation to the level of voluntary contraction. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[14]  J. Whitall,et al.  Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Improves Motor Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke , 2000, Stroke.

[15]  G. Hagemann,et al.  Electrophysiological transcortical diaschisis after cortical photothrombosis in rat brain. , 1996, Stroke.

[16]  E. Wassermann Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  N. Davey,et al.  Facilitation of human first dorsal interosseous muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary contraction of the contralateral homonymous muscle , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  W. Byblow,et al.  Symmetric facilitation between motor cortices during contraction of ipsilateral hand muscles , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R N Lemon,et al.  Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  E. Olivier,et al.  Task‐related variation in corticospinal output evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the macaque monkey. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  H. Woldag,et al.  Enhanced Motor Cortex Excitability During Ipsilateral Voluntary Hand Activation in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[22]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Preservation of directly stimulated muscle strength in hemiplegia due to stroke. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  J. Liepert,et al.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.