Motion Adaptation Distorts Perceived Visual Position

After an observer adapts to a moving stimulus, texture within a stationary stimulus is perceived to drift in the opposite direction-the traditional motion aftereffect (MAE). It has recently been shown that the perceived position of objects can be markedly influenced by motion adaptation. In the present study, we examine the selectivity of positional shifts resulting from motion adaptation to stimulus attributes such as velocity, relative contrast, and relative spatial frequency. In addition, we ask whether spatial position can be modified in the absence of perceived motion. Results show that when adapting and test stimuli have collinear carrier gratings, the global position of the object shows a substantial shift in the direction of the illusory motion. When the carrier gratings of the adapting and test stimuli are orthogonal (a configuration in which no MAE is experienced), a global positional shift of similar magnitude is found. The illusory positional shift was found to be immune to changes in spatial frequency and to contrast between adapting and test stimuli-manipulations that dramatically reduce the magnitude of the traditional MAE. The lack of sensitivity for stimulus characteristics other than direction of motion suggests that a specialized population of cortical neurones, which are insensitive to changes in a number of rudimentary visual attributes, may modulate positional representation in lower cortical areas.

[1]  O E Favreau,et al.  Evidence for parallel processing in motion perception. , 1981, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[4]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[5]  C. A. Burbeck Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgments , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  S. Nishida,et al.  Contrast Dependencies of Two Types of Motion Aftereffect , 1997, Vision Research.

[9]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Independent Aftereffects of Attention and Motion , 2000, Neuron.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Pantle,et al.  Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[13]  S. Zeki,et al.  The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V1 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[16]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[18]  M. Webster,et al.  Changes in colour appearance following post-receptoral adaptation , 1991, Nature.

[19]  R. Snowden,et al.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion , 1998, Current Biology.

[20]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  C. Baker,et al.  Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect , 1992, Vision Research.

[22]  O. Favreau Motion aftereffects: Evidence for parallel processing in motion perception , 1976, Vision Research.