Induction of notochord cell intercalation behavior and differentiation by progressive signals in the gastrula of Xenopus laevis.

We show that notochord-inducing signals are present during Xenopus laevis gastrulation and that they are important for both inducing and organizing cell behavior and differentiation in the notochord. Previous work showed that convergent extension of prospective notochordal and somitic mesoderm occurs by mediolateral cell intercalation to produce a longer, narrower tissue. Mediolateral cell intercalation is driven by bipolar, mediolaterally directed protrusive activity that elongates cells and then pulls them between one another along the mediolateral axis. This cell behavior, and subsequent notochordal cell differentiation, begins anteriorly and spreads posteriorly along the notochordal-somitic boundary, and from this lateral boundary progresses medially towards the center of the notochord field. To examine whether these progressions of cell behaviors and differentiation are induced and organized during gastrulation, we grafted labeled cells from the prospective notochordal, somitic and epidermal regions of the gastrula into the notochordal region and monitored their behavior by low light, fluorescence videomicroscopy. Prospective notochordal, epidermal and somitic cells expressed mediolateral cell intercalation behavior in an anterior-to-posterior and lateral-to-medial order established by the host notochord. Behavioral changes were induced first and most dramatically among cells grafted next to the notochordal-somitic boundary, particularly those in direct contact with the boundary, suggesting that the boundary may provide signals that both induce and organize notochordal cell behaviors. By physically impeding normal convergent extension movements, notochordal cell behaviors and differentiation were restricted to the anteriormost notochordal region and to the lateral notochordal-somitic boundary. These results show that mediolateral cell intercalation behavior and notochordal differentiation can be induced in the gastrula stage, among cells not normally expressing these characteristics, and that these characteristics are induced progressively, most likely by signals emanating from the notochordal-somitic boundary. In addition, they show that morphogenetic movements during gastrulation are necessary for complete notochord formation and that the prospective notochord region is not determined by the onset of gastrulation.

[1]  R. Keller,et al.  Vital Dye Mapping of the Gastrula and Neurula of Xenopus Laevis , 1975 .

[2]  P. Kushner.  A Library of Monoclonal Antibodies to Torpedo Cholinergic Synaptosomes , 1984, Journal of neurochemistry.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Esko,et al.  Cell surface, heparin-like molecules are required for binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to its high affinity receptor , 1991, Cell.

[4]  K. Kao,et al.  The entire mesodermal mantle behaves as Spemann's organizer in dorsoanterior enhanced Xenopus laevis embryos. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[5]  J. Slack,et al.  Mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos by heparin-binding growth factors , 1987, Nature.

[6]  R. Keller,et al.  Cell rearrangement during gastrulation of Xenopus: direct observation of cultured explants. , 1991, Development.

[7]  R. Keller,et al.  Xenopus gastrulation without a blastocoel roof , 1992, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[8]  R. Harland,et al.  In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[9]  J. Shih,et al.  Patterns of cell motility in the organizer and dorsal mesoderm of Xenopus laevis. , 1992, Development.

[10]  R. Keller,et al.  The Cellular Basis of Gastrulation in Xenopus laevis: Active, Postinvolution Convergence and Extension by Mediolateral Interdigitation , 1984 .

[11]  J M Slack,et al.  eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[12]  P. Good,et al.  The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. , 1992, Genes & development.

[13]  James C. Smith,et al.  Gastrulation movements provide an early marker of mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis , 1987 .

[14]  D. Melton,et al.  Processed Vg1 protein is an axial mesoderm inducer in xenopus , 1993, Cell.

[15]  J. Brockes,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating muscle in newt limb regeneration , 1984, Nature.

[16]  B. Hogan,et al.  Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. , 1991, Development.

[17]  H. Grunz.  The Dorsalization of Spermann's Organizer Takes Place during Gastrulation in Xenopus laevis Embryos , 1993, Development, growth & differentiation.

[18]  J. Fey,et al.  Appearance and distribution of laminin during development of Xenopus laevis. , 1990, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[19]  J. Cooke,et al.  The restrictive effect of early exposure to lithium upon body pattern in Xenopus development, studied by quantitative anatomy and immunofluorescence. , 1988, Development.

[20]  J. Cooke.  Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. II. Positional information for axial organization in embryos with two head organizers. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[21]  R. Winklbauer.  Cell proliferation in the ectoderm of the Xenopus embryo: development of substratum requirements for cytokinesis. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[22]  J. Smith,et al.  Expression of a xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction , 1991, Cell.

[23]  J. Shih,et al.  Planar induction of convergence and extension of the neural plate by the organizer of Xenopus , 1992, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[24]  William C. Smith,et al.  Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos , 1992, Cell.

[25]  J. Cooke.  Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. I. Autonomy of cell behaviour at the site of initial organizer formation. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[26]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Early cellular interactions promote embryonic axis formation in Xenopus laevis. , 1984, Developmental biology.

[27]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Heparitinase inhibition of mesoderm induction and gastrulation in Xenopus laevis embryos. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[28]  J. Smith,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein 4: a ventralizing factor in early Xenopus development. , 1992, Development.

[29]  J. Shih,et al.  The function and mechanism of convergent extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[30]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Expression of an engrailed-related protein is induced in the anterior neural ectoderm of early Xenopus embryos. , 1989, Development.

[31]  Carmen R. Domingo,et al.  Pintallavis, a gene expressed in the organizer and midline cells of frog embryos: involvement in the development of the neural axis. , 1992 .

[32]  U. Rutishauser,et al.  Topography of N-CAM structural and functional determinants. I. Classification of monoclonal antibody epitopes , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  S. Moody,et al.  The cleavage stage origin of Spemann's Organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus. , 1994, Development.

[34]  S. Sokol,et al.  Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are required for mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. , 1994, Development.

[35]  R. Keller,et al.  The cellular basis of epiboly: an SEM study of deep-cell rearrangement during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. , 1980, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[36]  J. Braun,et al.  Improved fluorescent compounds for tracing cell lineage. , 1985, Developmental biology.

[37]  A. Sater,et al.  An increase in intracellular pH during neural induction in Xenopus. , 1994, Development.

[38]  J. Smith,et al.  Responses of embryonic xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm , 1992, Cell.

[39]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Planar induction of anteroposterior pattern in the developing central nervous system of Xenopus laevis. , 1992, Science.

[40]  P. Kushner,et al.  Ventral ectoderm of Xenopus forms neural tissue, including hindbrain, in response to activin. , 1992, Development.

[41]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in xenopus embryos , 1991, Cell.

[42]  R. Harland,et al.  Secreted noggin protein mimics the Spemann organizer in dorsalizing Xenopus mesoderm , 1993, Nature.

[43]  I. Dawid,et al.  Differential keratin gene expression during the differentiation of the cement gland of Xenopus laevis. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[44]  P. Tibbetts,et al.  Mediolateral cell intercalation in the dorsal, axial mesoderm of Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[45]  Ken W. Y. Cho,et al.  Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid , 1991, Cell.

[46]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Synergistic induction of mesoderm by FGF and TGF-β and the identification of an mRNA coding for FGF in the early xenopus embryo , 1987, Cell.

[47]  R. Gimlich.  Cytoplasmic localization and chordamesoderm induction in the frog embryo. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[48]  J. Shih,et al.  The patterning and functioning of protrusive activity during convergence and extension of the Xenopus organiser. , 1992, Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement.

[49]  D. Melton,et al.  A truncated activin receptor inhibits mesoderm induction and formation of axial structures in Xenopus embryos , 1992, Nature.

[50]  R. Keller,et al.  An experimental analysis of the role of bottle cells and the deep marginal zone in gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. , 1981, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[51]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Community effects and related phenomena in development , 1993, Cell.

[52]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Blastomere derivation and domains of gene expression in the Spemann Organizer of Xenopus laevis. , 1995, Development.

[53]  B. Kay,et al.  Xenopus laevis : practical uses in cell and molecular biology , 1991 .

[54]  J. Shih,et al.  Cell motility driving mediolateral intercalation in explants of Xenopus laevis. , 1992, Development.

[55]  R. Harland,et al.  A nodal-related gene defines a physical and functional domain within the Spemann organizer , 1995, Cell.

[56]  R. R. Bensley,et al.  Embryonic Development and Induction , 1938, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[57]  J. Smith,et al.  A mesoderm-inducing factor is produced by Xenopus cell line. , 1987, Development.

[58]  O. Nakamura,et al.  Prospective Fates of Blastomeres at the 32 Cell Stage of Xenopus laevis Embryos , 1971 .

[59]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) , 1995 .

[60]  G. von Dassow,et al.  Induction of the Xenopus organizer: expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. , 1993, Genes & development.