Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity

[1]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[2]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.

[3]  Frank Keller,et al.  A Psycholinguistically Motivated Version of TAG , 2008, TAG.

[4]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Frank Keller,et al.  Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms , 2008 .

[6]  Frank Keller,et al.  Locality, Cyclicity, and Resumption: At the Interface between the Grammar and the Human Sentence Processor , 2007 .

[7]  Frank Keller,et al.  Eye-tracking Evidence for Integration Cost Effects in Corpus Data , 2007 .

[8]  Ulrike Padó,et al.  The integration of syntax and semantic plausibility in a wide-coverage model of human sentence processing , 2007 .

[9]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining both Locality and Antilocality Effects , 2006 .

[10]  Tobias Richter,et al.  What Is Wrong With ANOVA and Multiple Regression? Analyzing Sentence Reading Times With Hierarchical Linear Models , 2006 .

[11]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Statistics in the Resolution of Syntactic Category Ambiguity. , 2006 .

[12]  J. Elman.  Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, And Grammatical Structure , 1991, Machine Learning.

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[18]  Carlota Smith.  Modes of Discourse: Referring expressions in discourse , 2003 .

[19]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  Geoffrey Sampson,et al.  English for the Computer: The SUSANNE Corpus and Analytic Scheme , 1995, Computational Linguistics.

[21]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[22]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[23]  Brian Roark,et al.  Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.

[24]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Bayesian Model Predicts Human Parse Preference and Reading Times in Sentence Processing , 2001, NIPS.

[25]  L Konieczny,et al.  Locality and Parsing Complexity , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .

[27]  E. Gibson.  The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[28]  A. Marantz,et al.  Image, language, brain : papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium , 2000 .

[29]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[32]  Dekang Lin,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity , 1998, ICML.

[33]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[34]  G. Underwood.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[35]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[36]  Ronald Rosenfeld,et al.  Statistical language modeling using the CMU-cambridge toolkit , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[37]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[38]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[39]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis , 1993 .

[40]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[41]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[43]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[44]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The zero-frequency problem: Estimating the probabilities of novel events in adaptive text compression , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[45]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .