Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis

In order to better understand how to design hands-on child-computer interaction, we explore how different styles of interaction facilitate children's thinking while they use their hands to manipulate objects. We present an exploratory study of children solving a spatial puzzle task. We investigate how the affordances of physical, graphical and tangible interfaces may facilitate the development of thinking skills including mental visualisation, problem space exploration and collaboration. We utilise the theory of complementary actions taken from embodied cognition to develop a video coding methodology that allows us to classify behavioural activity and make inferences about thinking skills development. Our findings indicated that the combination of direct hands-on input style with audio-visual feedback facilitated by the tangible user interface enabled a dynamic task completion strategy, which supports the development of mental skills with a slight time cost. The mouse and graphical user interface supported a trial and error approach, which may limit skills development. The physical cardboard puzzle enabled effective task completion but provided less support for social interaction and problem space exploration. We conclude with design recommendations.

[1]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[2]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[3]  Karen Tanenbaum,et al.  The EventTable technique: distributed fiducial markers , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[4]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[5]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Computer as Paintbrush: Technology, Play, and the Creative Society , 2006 .

[6]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Does mouse size affect study and evaluation results?: a study comparing preschool children's performance with small and regular-sized mice , 2007, IDC.

[7]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[8]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[9]  S. M. Hansen Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[10]  Allison Druin,et al.  Child's play: a comparison of desktop and physical interactive environments , 2005, IDC '05.

[11]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  David Kirsh,et al.  Complementary Strategies: Why we use our hands when we think , 1995 .

[13]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Hands on what?: comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction , 2009, IDC.

[14]  D. Clements ‘Concrete’ Manipulatives, Concrete Ideas , 2000 .

[15]  Mark L. Johnson The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[16]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[17]  Sara Price,et al.  Towards a framework for investigating tangible environments for learning , 2008, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[18]  Allison Druin,et al.  Physical programming: designing tools for children to create physical interactive environments , 2002, CHI.

[19]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think , 2003 .

[20]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  This is fun! we're all best friends and we're all playing: supporting children's synchronous collaboration , 1999, CSCL.

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  From Snark to Park: Lessons Learnt Moving Pervasive Experiences From Indoors to Outdoors , 2004, AUIC.

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[23]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[24]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with , 1998, CHI.

[25]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces , 2008, AVI '08.

[26]  Susan Goldin Hearing gesture : how our hands help us think , 2003 .

[27]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design , 2006, DIS '06.

[28]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Identifying embodied metaphors in children's sound-action mappings , 2009, IDC.

[29]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships , 2005, CHI.

[30]  R. Wallace The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason , 1988 .

[31]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[32]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  A mischief of mice: examining children's performance in single display groupware systems with 1 to 32 mice , 2009, CHI.

[33]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[34]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[35]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[36]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[37]  Maria Montessori,et al.  The Secret of Childhood , 1945 .

[38]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[39]  D. Kirsh Distributed Cognition , Coordination and Environment Design , 1999 .

[40]  Ezequiel Morsella,et al.  The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. , 2004, The American journal of psychology.

[41]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Towards a new kind of computational manipulative: children learning math and designing quilts with manipulatives that afford both , 2004, IDC '04.

[42]  Jakob Tholander,et al.  Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space , 2006, CHI.