Making Good Decisions with Minimal Information: Simultaneous and Sequential Choice

The adaptive pressures facing humans and other animals to make decisions quickly can be met both by increasing internal information-processing speed and by minimizing the amount of information to be used. Here we focus on the latter effect and ask how, and how well, agents can make good decisions with a minimal amount of information, using two specific tasks as examples. When a choice must be made between simultaneously-available options, minimal information in the form of binary recognition (whether or not each item is recognized) can be used in the recognition heuristic to choose effectively. When options are encountered sequentially one at a time, minimal information as to whether or not each option is the best encountered so far is sufficient to guide agents using a simple search-cutoff rule to high performance along several choice criteria. Both of these examples have important economic as well as biological applications, and show the power of simple fast and frugal heuristics to produce good decisions with little information.

[1]  G. Stigler.  The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  L. V. Jones,et al.  Decision making in a sequential search task , 1967 .

[3]  M. Degroot.  Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[4]  C. L. Olson,et al.  Context effects in optional stopping decisions , 1975 .

[5]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[6]  Ruth M Corbin,et al.  The secretary problem as a model of choice , 1980 .

[7]  Yale M. Braunstein,et al.  ECONOMIC SEARCH: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1981 .

[8]  John D. Hey,et al.  Search for rules for search , 1982 .

[9]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[10]  B. Galef,et al.  Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway rats , 1987 .

[11]  Thomas S. Ferguson,et al.  Who Solved the Secretary Problem , 1989 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Andrew Martin,et al.  Better Heuristics for Economic Search — Experimental and Simulation Evidence , 1990 .

[14]  J. Shanteau.  How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? , 1992 .

[15]  T. Sargent.  Bounded rationality in macroeconomics , 1993 .

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[17]  M. Quine,et al.  Exact results for a secretary problem , 1996, Journal of Applied Probability.

[18]  Nicolaas J. Vriend,et al.  Rational behavior and economic theory , 1996 .

[19]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Sequential Decision Making with Relative Ranks: An Experimental Investigation of the "Secretary Problem"> , 1997 .

[21]  R. Johnstone.  The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. , 1998 .

[23]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[24]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[25]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Can ignorance beat the stock market , 1999 .

[26]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: Lessons from two-sided matching , 2000 .

[27]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: the secretary problem with unknown population size , 2000 .

[28]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds , 2001 .

[29]  P. Todd,et al.  More Is Not Always Better: The Benefits of Cognitive Limits , 2003 .