A Background-Purification-Based Framework for Anomaly Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

Anomaly target detection for hyperspectral imagery (HSI) is one of the most important techniques, and many anomaly detection algorithms have been developed in recent years. One of the key points in most anomaly detection algorithms is estimating and suppressing the background information. This letter proposes a background-purification-based (BPB) framework considering the role of background estimation and suppression in anomaly detection. The main idea is the acquisition of accurate background pixel set. To prove the validity of the proposed framework, the BPB Reed-Xiaoli detector (BPB-RXD), the BPB kernel Reed-Xiaoli detector (BPB-KRXD), and the BPB orthogonal subspace projection anomaly detector (BPB-OSPAD) are proposed. Both the BPB algorithms focus on accurate background information estimation to improve the performance of the detectors. The experiments implemented on two data sets demonstrate that both BPB algorithms perform better than other state-of-the-art algorithms, including RXD, KRXD, OSP, blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators (BACON), probabilistic anomaly detector (PAD), collaborative-representation-based detector (CRD), and CRD combined with principal component analysis (PCAroCRD).

[1]  Bo Du,et al.  Random-Selection-Based Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Sebastián López,et al.  An Algorithm for an Accurate Detection of Anomalies in Hyperspectral Images With a Low Computational Complexity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Lianru Gao,et al.  Probabilistic anomaly detector for remotely sensed hyperspectral data , 2014 .

[5]  Bo Du,et al.  A spectral-spatial based local summation anomaly detection method for hyperspectral images , 2016, Signal Process..

[6]  Bo Du,et al.  A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Hassan Ghassemian,et al.  Anomaly Detection of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Modified Collaborative Representation , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[8]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Hyperspectral Target Detection : An Overview of Current and Future Challenges , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Yongchao Zhao,et al.  A Small Target Detection Method for the Hyperspectral Image Based on Higher Order Singular Value Decomposition (HOSVD) , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[10]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Analysis and Optimizations of Global and Local Versions of the RX Algorithm for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Data , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Chong Liu,et al.  Urban Change Detection Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory for Multitemporal Very High-Resolution Imagery , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Geng XiuRui,et al.  Principle of small target detection for hyperspectral imagery , 2007 .

[13]  Qian Du,et al.  Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Using Collaborative Representation With Outlier Removal , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Chunhui Zhao,et al.  A background refinement method based on local density for hyperspectral anomaly detection , 2018 .

[15]  A. Hadi,et al.  BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators , 2000 .

[16]  J. Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[17]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Kenneth W. Bauer,et al.  A Locally Adaptable Iterative RX Detector , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[19]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[20]  Jane You,et al.  Hyperspectral image unsupervised classification by robust manifold matrix factorization , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[21]  W. R. Windham,et al.  Contaminant classification of poultry hyperspectral imagery using a spectral angle mapper algorithm , 2007 .

[22]  Bo Du,et al.  Independent Encoding Joint Sparse Representation and Multitask Learning for Hyperspectral Target Detection , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[23]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[24]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel matched subspace detectors for hyperspectral target detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Points of Significance: Visualizing samples with box plots , 2014, Nature Methods.