On the Reconciliation of Probability Assessments

Abstract : This paper investigates the question of how to reconcile incoherent probability assessments, i.e., assessments that are inconsistent with the laws of probability. A general model for the analysis of probability assessments is introduced, and two approaches to the reconciliation problem are developed. In the internal approach, one estimates the subject's true probabilities on the basis of his assessments. In the external approach, an external observer updates his own coherent probabilities in the light of the assessments made by the subject. The two approaches are illustrated and discussed. Least-squares procedures for reconciliation are developed within the internal approach. (Author)

[1]  L. J. Savage,et al.  Probability and the weighing of evidence , 1951 .

[2]  A. Ginsberg.  Hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. , 1954, Psychological review.

[3]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[4]  D. Cox.  Two further applications of a model for binary regression , 1958 .

[5]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Studies in Subjective Probability , 1965 .

[6]  I. Good.  A Bayesian Significance Test for Multinomial Distributions , 1967 .

[7]  R. L. Winkler.  Scoring Rules and the Evaluation of Probability Assessors , 1969 .

[8]  M. Stone,et al.  Marginalization Paradoxes in Bayesian and Structural Inference , 1973 .

[9]  Peter A. Morris,et al.  Decision Analysis Expert Use , 1974 .

[10]  D. Davidson,et al.  Psychology as Philosophy , 1974 .

[11]  David Lindley,et al.  The future of statistics-A Bayesian 21st Century , 1974 .

[12]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[14]  M. Bacharach.  Group Decisions in the Face of Differences of Opinion , 1975 .

[15]  I. Good.  On the Application of Symmetric Dirichlet Distributions and their Mixtures to Contingency Tables , 1976 .

[16]  A. Dawid.  Invariant distributions and analysis of variance models , 1977 .

[17]  Peter A. Morris,et al.  Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach , 1977 .

[18]  D. Schum.  Contrast effects in inference: On the conditioning of current evidence by prior evidence , 1977 .

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[20]  S. J. Press,et al.  Assessing Technological Advancement Using Groups of Experts , 1978 .

[21]  S. R. Watson,et al.  The Valuation of Decision Analysis , 1978 .

[22]  Wayne S. Smith,et al.  Adaptive Forecasting Models Based on Predictive Distributions , 1978 .

[23]  I. Good.  C41. On the combination of judgements concerning quantiles of a distribution with potential application to the estimation of mineral resources , 1979 .

[24]  J. Dickey.  Beliefs about beliefs, a theory for stochastic assessments of subjective probabilities , 1980 .

[25]  Wayne S. Smith,et al.  Interactive Elicitation of Opinion for a Normal Linear Model , 1980 .

[26]  Simon French,et al.  Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else's Opinion , 1980 .

[27]  I. Good,et al.  Density Estimation and Bump-Hunting by the Penalized Likelihood Method Exemplified by Scattering and Meteorite Data , 1980 .