A Computerized System to Assess Axillary Lymph Node Malignancy from Sonographic Images.

A computational approach to classifying axillary lymph node metastasis in sonographic images is described. One hundred five ultrasound images of axillary lymph nodes from patients with breast cancer were evaluated (81 benign and 24 malignant), and each lymph node was manually segmented, delineating both the whole lymph node and internal hilum surfaces. Normalized signed distance transforms were computed from the segmented boundaries of both structures, and each pixel was then assigned coordinates in a 3-D feature space according to the pixel's intensity, its signed distance to the node boundary and its signed distance to the hilum boundary. Three-dimensional histograms over the feature space were accumulated for each node by summing over all pixels, and the bin counts served as predictor inputs to a support vector machine learning algorithm. Repeated random sampling of 80/25 train/test splits was used to estimate generalization performance and generate receiver operating characteristic curves. The optimal classifier had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.90. Our results indicate the feasibility of axillary nodal staging with computerized analysis.

[1]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Deformable segmentation of 3-D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  I D Wilkinson,et al.  Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[4]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[5]  Savitri Krishnamurthy,et al.  Role of ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[6]  Jayanta Basak,et al.  A least square kernel machine with box constraints , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[8]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Novel Morphological and Appearance Features for Predicting Physical Disability from MR Images in Multiple Sclerosis Patients , 2014 .

[9]  Gary J. Whitman,et al.  Lymph Node Sonography , 2011 .

[10]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Multi-modality morphological correlation of axillary lymph nodes , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[11]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Classification of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Breast Lesions by Support Vector Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Cross-Validation of Regression Models , 1984 .

[13]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  L Cohen,et al.  Physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  S. Mclaughlin,et al.  Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[18]  Patrick Haffner,et al.  Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[19]  C. Redmond,et al.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update , 1983, Cancer.

[20]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  AN MR BRAIN IMAGES CLASSIFIER VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND KERNEL SUPPORT , 2012 .

[21]  R. Chang,et al.  Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vector machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  S. Alvarez,et al.  Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Preoperative prediction of malignancy of ovarian tumors using least squares support vector machines , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[25]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy of Axillary Nodes in Invasive Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Its Accuracy and Utility in Staging the Axilla , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[26]  H. Kuerer,et al.  Meta‐analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer , 2006, The British journal of surgery.