Visual Acuity with Second and Third Generation Night Vision Goggles Obtained from a New Method of Night Sky Simulation Across a Wide Range of Target Contrast

Abstract : The purpose of this investigation was to study the primary factors which influence visual acuity (VA) with night vision goggles (NVGs). These factors are: night sky condition, target contrast, and NVG generation. Improved methods were used to simulate the night sky and to control for differences in target contrast which result from dissimilarities in spectral sensitivity between NVG generations. The new simulation method used combinations of spectrally flat (neutral density) and wavelength selective (blue glass) filters to reproduce the spectral distribution of the night sky across the entire NVG response range. Between-generation differences in target contrast were eliminated by weighting the incident radiant flux by the sensitivity of the detector. It was found that the difference in VA between the two generations widens under two conditions: (1) when target contrast is constant and night sky irradiance decreases, and (2) when night sky irradiance is constant and target contrast decreases. Furthermore, it was found that for a given NVG generation, VA falls off more rapidly for a low contrast target than for one of high contrast when night sky irradiance decreases.

[1]  G. E. Kline,et al.  Performance of Young and Older Drivers on a Static Acuity Test under Photopic and Mesopic Luminance Conditions , 1990, Human factors.

[2]  Clarence E. Rash,et al.  Human Factors And Safety Considerations Of Night Vision Systems Flight , 1989, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Grieve,et al.  Tests of sphericity of normal distributions and the analysis of repeated measures designs , 1984 .

[5]  S. Coren Reporting the Visual Acuity of Groups: The Relation among Alternate Measures , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[6]  J M Wild,et al.  SOME STATISTICAL CONCEPTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VISION AND VISUAL ACUITY , 1985, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  E. Berson,et al.  Advances in night vision technology. A pocketscope for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1973, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  I L Bailey,et al.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  uenter for Night Vision and Electro-Optics , 2022 .

[10]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  Von Gierke He,et al.  Comparative effects of vibration on monocular and binocular vision. , 1971 .

[12]  L J Press,et al.  Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity. , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye. , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  K L Hoover Visual Acuity with the ITT Night Vision Aid for Patients With Night Blindness , 1983, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[15]  R. Rabbetts,et al.  Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.