DIMACS Technical Report 2009-12 November 2009 Supporting Cognitive Models of Sensemaking in Analytics Systems

Cognitive science is providing the scienti c community with increasingly well-supported models of the mental stages and representations that professional analysts go through in the course of conducting an investigation, be it reactive or proactive in nature. These process models are generally advanced within the eld of Sensemaking, because the analyst's primary task can be viewed as \making sense" of a large body of unorganized information. One of the most well-known long-running Sensemaking investigations is that of Pirolli and Card et al. [Pir05] Their resulting model provides an initial basis for our research. In using these models to improve analytics systems, we have at least two distinct problems: (1) how to use information about the Sensemaking states gained from user interactions with an analytics system to learn the parameters of an e ective analysis process, and (2) how to use this knowledge to provide user guidance that results in better human-machine interaction and a more robust investigative process. The answers to these questions lie at the intersection of research in machine learning, knowledge representation, user interfaces and cognitive science, and addressing them requires an end-to-end system perspective. In this report, we survey these problems and discuss our approach, system design, and experimental design. In particular, we de ne the Sensemaking model's representation within the software framework, the set of machine learning tasks for learning the parameters of an e cient process, our initial user interface design, the design of the meta-cognitive UI feedback, and nally the design of the initial experiments, including the ground truth which is from an actual solved crime case. We conclude with the insights gained thus far into building interactive systems that support users' cognitive models of Sensemaking.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[2]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  The cost structure of sensemaking , 1993, INTERCHI.

[4]  Jin H. Kim,et al.  Nonstationary hidden Markov model , 1995, Signal Process..

[5]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  Wizards, guides, and beyond: rational and empirical methods for selecting optimal intelligent user interface agents , 1997, IUI '97.

[6]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software , 2002, CHI.

[7]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach , 2003 .

[8]  Eugene Santos,et al.  User Modelling for Intent Prediction in Information Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Impacts of User Modeling on Personalization of Information Retrieval : An Evaluation with Human Intelligence Analysts , 2005 .

[10]  Mark T. Maybury,et al.  Intelligent user interfaces for intelligence analysis , 2006, IUI '06.

[11]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  Link Analysis of Higher-Order Paths in Supervised Learning Datasets , 2006 .

[12]  Alexander W. Skaburskis,et al.  The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods , 2006, CHI.

[13]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[14]  Qi Li,et al.  How Up-to-date should it be? the Value of Instant Profiling and Adaptation in Information Filtering , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).

[15]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  Mining Higher-Order Association Rules from Distributed Named Entity Databases , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics.

[16]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  Context-Aware, adaptive information retrieval for investigative tasks , 2007, IUI '07.

[17]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2015 .

[18]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  An optimization-based approach to dynamic data transformation for smart visualization , 2008, IUI '08.

[19]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  An exploratory study of visual information analysis , 2008, CHI.

[20]  Anthony C. Robinson,et al.  Design for synthesis in geovisualization , 2008 .

[21]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization , 2008, CHI.

[22]  Weng-Keen Wong,et al.  Integrating rich user feedback into intelligent user interfaces , 2008, IUI '08.

[23]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  Characterizing Users' Visual Analytic Activity for Insight Provenance , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[24]  William M. Pottenger,et al.  Leveraging Higher Order Dependencies Between Features for Text Classification , 2009 .

[25]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces , 2009, CSUR.

[26]  W. Pottenger,et al.  Privacy-Enhancing Distributed Higher-Order ARM , 2009 .