Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL.

OBJECTIVES To explore the potential role of a neural network-derived algorithm in enhancing the specificity of prostate cancer detection compared with the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) while maintaining a 90% detection rate. Recent information suggests that the incidence of detectable prostate cancer is similar in men whose PSA values range from 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL and from 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL. If the PSA threshold triggering a prostate biopsy is lowered to 2.5 ng/mL, approximately 13% of men older than 50 would be added to the patient biopsy pool. METHODS One hundred fifty-one men were enrolled in a prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved protocol to evaluate the incidence of cancer in a population of men who participated in an early-detection program and whose PSA level was between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/mL. All the men underwent biopsy using an 11-core multisite-directed biopsy scheme, and all biopsy specimens were examined by one pathologist. All men had a second blood specimen drawn before the biopsy for a determination of serum PSA, creatinine kinase, prostatic acid phosphatase, and fPSA. A new neural network algorithm was developed with PSA, creatinine kinase, prostatic acid phosphatase, fPSA, and age as input variables to produce a single-valued prostate cancer detection index (PCD-I). This new algorithm was then prospectively tested in the 151 men. Performance parameters (including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and biopsies saved) were calculated, and a comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the differences among the new algorithm, percent fPSA, PSA density, and PSA density-transition zone. RESULTS Cancer was histologically confirmed in 24.5% (37 of 151) of the men. The median age of the men was 62 years (range 43 to 74). At a sensitivity of 92%, the specificity for percent fPSA was 11%. The new algorithm (PCD-I) demonstrated an additional enhancement of specificity to 62% at 92% sensitivity. Clinically, the PCD-I would result in a savings of 49% (74 of 151) of all biopsies or 63.6% (71 of 114) of all unnecessary biopsies. CONCLUSIONS A new generation algorithm, derived from a neural network (PCD-I) incorporating the parameters of age, creatinine kinase, PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase, and fPSA can significantly enhance the specificity and reduce the number of biopsies while maintaining a 92% sensitivity rate.

[1]  D. Chan,et al.  Complexed prostate specific antigen provides significant enhancement of specificity compared with total prostate specific antigen for detecting prostate cancer. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Jerome P. Richie,et al.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  R. Babaian,et al.  The distribution of prostate specific antigen in men without clinical or pathological evidence of prostate cancer: relationship to gland volume and age. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[4]  P. Russo,et al.  Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy and cystectomy for unresectable bladder cancer. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[5]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of prostAsure index in the detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary report. , 1998, Urology.

[7]  D. Chan,et al.  Use of percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to identify men at high risk of prostate cancer when PSA levels are 2.51 to 4 ng/mL and digital rectal examination is not suspicious for prostate cancer: an alternative model. , 1999, Urology.

[8]  R. Kane,et al.  Cost‐effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low‐yield biopsies , 1994 .

[9]  D. Johnston,et al.  A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[10]  R. Kane,et al.  American cancer society–national prostate cancer detection project. Results from multiple examinations using transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate specific antigen , 1993, Cancer.

[11]  R. Kane,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen lewels in 1695 men without evidence of prostate cancer: Findings of the American cancer society national prostate cancer detection project , 2010, Cancer.

[12]  R. Babaian,et al.  Role of PSA and its indices in determining the need for repeat prostate biopsies. , 1997, Urology.

[13]  T. Stamey,et al.  Examination of the 3 molecular forms of serum prostate specific antigen for distinguishing negative from positive biopsy: relationship to transition zone volume. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[14]  A. Pollack,et al.  Radiation therapy for T1 and T2 prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and disease outcome. , 1995, Urology.

[15]  A W Partin,et al.  Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy. The Johns Hopkins experience after 10 years. , 1993, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[16]  D. Bostwick,et al.  ProstAsure Index in the detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, Urology.

[17]  D. Ornstein,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements. , 1997, JAMA.

[18]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[19]  G. Murphy,et al.  The national survey of prostate cancer in the United States by the American College of Surgeons. , 1982, The Journal of urology.

[20]  R. Kane,et al.  Characteristics of prostate cancers detected in a multimodality early detection program , 1993 .