A new generation of ultra-sensitive electrostatic accelerometers for GRACE Follow-on and towards the next generation gravity missions

Abstract The sensor core configuration of the electrostatic accelerometers of the CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE missions has been especially designed for space applications and so optimized in regard to the weak level of acceleration to sustain and measure in orbit. The return of experience of these three gravity space missions which demonstrate the robustness and the performances of this family of space instruments, allows a better optimization of the design of the accelerometer in terms of thermal stability and operation reliability for the near future missions as GRACE follow-on. The paper presents the improvement of the GRACE-FO accelerometer with respect to the still in-orbit previous models and a status of its development. Nevertheless because the next generation of low-low satellite to satellite tracking missions will take advantage of interferometer laser ranging methods to improve their performance, the noise level of the accelerometer has also to be lowered, especially in the low frequency bandwidth. In addition to the measurement of the surface forces exerted on the spacecraft by the atmospheric drag, by the Sun radiation and by the Earths albedo and infrared pressures, the accelerometer instrument becomes a major part of the attitude and orbit control system by acting as a drag free sensor and by accurately measuring the angular accelerations. Onera proposes a new configuration much more compact with performances in a better adequacy with a next generation of small but drag compensated micro-satellites or geodesy missions.

[1]  O. Viron,et al.  Comparative study of temporal variations in the earth’s gravity field using GRACE gravity models in the regions of three recent giant earthquakes , 2014, Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth.

[2]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Mapping the mass distribution of Earth’s mantle using satellite-derived gravity gradients , 2014 .

[3]  Anny Cazenave,et al.  The rate of sea-level rise , 2014 .

[4]  Urs Marti Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems: Proceedings of the IAG Symposium GGHS2012, October 9-12, 2012, Venice, Italy , 2014 .

[5]  J. Kusche,et al.  Comparing seven candidate mission configurations for temporal gravity field retrieval through full-scale numerical simulation , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[6]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  Precise accelerometry onboard the GRACE gravity field satellite mission , 2008 .

[7]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Global analysis of approaches for deriving total water storage changes from GRACE satellites , 2015 .

[8]  S. Reynaud,et al.  Electrostatic accelerometer with bias rejection for Gravitation and Solar System physics , 2010, 1011.6263.

[9]  M. R. van den Broeke,et al.  Evaluating Greenland glacial isostatic adjustment corrections using GRACE, altimetry and surface mass balance data , 2014 .

[10]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  A GRACE‐based water storage deficit approach for hydrological drought characterization , 2014 .

[11]  Isabella Velicogna,et al.  Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica using GRACE time‐variable gravity data , 2014 .

[12]  N. Picot,et al.  Beyond GOCE for the ocean circulation estimate: Synergetic use of altimetry, gravimetry, and in situ data provides new insight into geostrophic and Ekman currents , 2014 .

[13]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  ESA's satellite‐only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data , 2014 .

[14]  S. Reynaud,et al.  Experimental demonstration of bias rejection from electrostatic accelerometer measurements , 2013, 1303.3012.

[15]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Status of the GRACE Follow-On Mission , 2013 .

[16]  Eelco Doornbos,et al.  CHAMP and GRACE accelerometer calibration by GPS-based orbit determination , 2009 .

[17]  Stefano Cesare,et al.  Next Generation Gravity Mission , 2013 .