Evaluation of 39 medical implants at 7.0 T.

OBJECTIVE With increased signal to noise ratios, 7.0-T MRI has the potential to contribute unique information regarding anatomy and pathophysiology of a disease. However, concerns for the safety of subjects with metallic medical implants have hindered advancement in this field. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the MRI safety for 39 commonly used medical implants at 7.0 T. METHODS Selected metallic implants were tested for magnetic field interactions, radiofrequency-induced heating and artefacts using standardized testing techniques. RESULTS 5 of the 39 implants tested may be unsafe for subjects undergoing MRI at 7.0 T. CONCLUSION Implants were deemed either "MR Conditional" or "MR Unsafe" for the 7.0-T MRI environment. Further research is needed to expand the existing database categorizing implants that are acceptable for patients referred for MRI examinations at 7.0 T. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Lack of MRI testing for common metallic medical implants limits the translational potential of 7.0-T MRI. For safety reasons, patients with metallic implants are not allowed to undergo a 7.0-T MRI scan, precluding part of the population that can benefit from the detailed resolution of ultra-high-field MRIs. This investigation provides necessary MRI testing of common medical implants at 7.0 T.

[1]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Z. Cho,et al.  Seven‐tesla magnetic resonance images of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[3]  Nikos Evangelou,et al.  A Comparison of 3T and 7T in the Detection of Small Parenchymal Veins Within MS Lesions , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Jason Gerrard,et al.  7T MR spectroscopic imaging in the localization of surgical epilepsy , 2013, Epilepsia.

[5]  Patrick Asbach,et al.  Behavior of metal implants used in ENT surgery in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[6]  John Gosbee,et al.  Standardized MR terminology and reporting of implants and devices as recommended by the American College of Radiology Subcommittee on MR Safety. , 2015, Radiology.

[7]  Terry O Woods,et al.  MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  J. Gore,et al.  Application of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI for Endogenous Contrast at 7 Tesla , 2013, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[9]  G. Kerchner Ultra-high field 7T MRI: a new tool for studying Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[10]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  7 Tesla MRI in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[11]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0‐Tesla MR system , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Daniel Paech,et al.  Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement Mediated Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging at 7 Tesla in Glioblastoma Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  F. Barkhof,et al.  High field MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: high field–high yield? , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[14]  Eric C. Bourekas,et al.  RF-related heating assessment of extracranial neurosurgical implants at 7T. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  J. Zwanenburg,et al.  Clinical applications of 7 T MRI in the brain. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Richard A. E. Edden,et al.  Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7T , 2013, NeuroImage.

[17]  Effect of 7.0 Tesla MRI on Upper Eyelid Implants , 2006, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. , 2004, Radiology.

[19]  Yukihiko Fujii,et al.  In Vivo Visualization of Senile‐Plaque‐Like Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Patients by MR Microscopy on a 7T System , 2008, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[20]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Feasibility of Using Ultra-High Field (7 T) MRI for Clinical Surgical Targeting , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  M. Tosetti,et al.  Ultra-High-Field MR Imaging in Polymicrogyria and Epilepsy , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[22]  John M Pauly,et al.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Terry O Woods,et al.  Standards for medical devices in MRI: Present and future , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Regarding the value reported for the term "spatial gradient magnetic field" and how this information is applied to labeling of medical implants and devices. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.