Elucidating mechanisms of solvent toxicity in ethanologenic Escherichia coli

Ethanol toxicity and its effect on ethanol production by the recombinant ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain KO11 were investigated in batch and continuous fermentation. During batch growth, ethanol produced by KO11 reduced both the specific cell growth rate (µ) and the cell yield (YX/S). The extent of inhibition increased with the production of both acetate and lactate. Subsequent accumulation of these metabolites and ethanol resulted in cessation of cell growth, redirection of metabolism to reduce ethanol production, and increased requirements for cell maintenance. These effects were found to depend on both the glycolytic flux and the flux from pyruvate to ethanol. Pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc) and alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) activities measured during the batch fermentation suggested that decreased ethanol production resulted from enzyme inhibition rather than down‐regulation of genes in the ethanol‐producing pathway. Ethanol was added in continuous fermentation to provide an ethanol concentration of either 17 or 27 g/L, triggering sustained oscillations in the cell growth rate. Cell concentrations oscillated in‐phase with ethanol and acetate concentrations. The amplitude of oscillations depended on the concentration of ethanol in the fermentor. Through multiple oscillatory cycles, the yield (YP/S) and concentration of ethanol decreased, while production of acetate increased. These results suggest that KO11 favorably adapted to improve growth by synthesizing more ATP though acetate production, and recycling NADH by producing more lactate and less ethanol. Implications of these results for strategies to improve ethanol production are described. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;106: 721–730. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  F. Srienc,et al.  Minimal Escherichia coli Cell for the Most Efficient Production of Ethanol from Hexoses and Pentoses , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  F. Bolivar,et al.  Specific Ethanol Production Rate in Ethanologenic Escherichia coli Strain KO11 Is Limited by Pyruvate Decarboxylase , 2008, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[3]  Venkatesh Balan,et al.  Ethanolic fermentation of hydrolysates from ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) treated corn stover and distillers grain without detoxification and external nutrient supplementation , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Yoshio Katakura,et al.  Strategies for reducing supplemental medium cost in bioethanol production from waste house wood hydrolysate by ethanologenic Escherichia coli: inoculum size increase and coculture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[5]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Addressing the need for alternative transportation fuels: the Joint BioEnergy Institute. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[6]  Y. Y. Lee,et al.  Pretreatment of corn stover by soaking in aqueous ammonia at moderate temperatures , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[7]  S. Varanasi,et al.  Enhanced ethanol fermentation of brewery wastewater using the genetically modified strain E. coli KO11 , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  R. Carlson,et al.  Fundamental Escherichia coli biochemical pathways for biomass and energy production: creation of overall flux states , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal,et al.  Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. , 2000 .

[10]  G. Stanley,et al.  Comparative stability of ethanol production by Escherichia coliKO11 in batch and chemostat culture , 1999, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  B. Dien,et al.  Fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars using a novel ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain. , 1998 .

[12]  N. Ho,et al.  Genetically Engineered SaccharomycesYeast Capable of Effective Cofermentation of Glucose and Xylose , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  L. Olsson,et al.  Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. , 1996 .

[14]  Min Zhang,et al.  Metabolic Engineering of a Pentose Metabolism Pathway in Ethanologenic Zymomonas mobilis , 1995, Science.

[15]  K. Shanmugam,et al.  Genetic improvement of Escherichia coli for ethanol production: chromosomal integration of Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  D. Clark,et al.  Anaerobic fermentation balance of Escherichia coli as observed by in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  H. Blanch,et al.  By‐product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal,et al.  Metabolic engineering for pentose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[19]  H. Doelle,et al.  Purification and kinetic characteristics of pyruvate decarboxylase and ethanol dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis in relation to ethanol production , 2004, European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[20]  B. Dien,et al.  Development of new ethanologenic Escherichia coli strains for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass , 2000 .

[21]  F. Srienc,et al.  Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia Coli for Efficient Conversion of Glycerol into Ethanol , 2022 .