Cognitive Arguments for a Fuzzy Construction Grammar

Following Desagulier (2005), I assume that it is by studying intermediate forms that we can gain a better understanding of creativity and innovation, from both a linguistic and a cognitive perspective. My case studies tend to show that form/function reshuffling is best understood as a grammatical blend, for which I offer a new definition, based on a critical examination of works by Fauconnier and Turner (1996, 1998, 2002) and Fauconnier (1997). Constructional integration networks, which are the keystone of my model, hinge on the following principle: a construction that is cognitively salient provides can serve as the basis for the structuring of speakers' mental grammars. This stable symbolic unit can thus (i) be retrieved wholly or partially to provide a template for the composition of new constructions (ii) help speakers/hearers gain access to more complex pairings.

[1]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[2]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Elizabeth S. Sklar The Possessive Apostrophe: The Development and Decline of a Crooked Mark. , 1976 .

[4]  D. Bolinger Generality, gradience, and the all-or-none , 1961 .

[5]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Evidence in linguistics: Three approaches to genitives in English , 2002 .

[6]  Paul Deane,et al.  English Possessives, Topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy , 1987 .

[7]  Simon Kerl A comprehensive grammar of the English language , .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[9]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[10]  Christopher Ronald Johnson Constructional grounding : the role of interpretational overlap in lexical and constructional acquisition , 1999 .

[11]  G. Fauconnier Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[12]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Blending as a Central Process of Grammar , 1996 .

[13]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Grammar , 1997 .

[15]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive variation in English : conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies , 2002 .

[16]  John R. Taylor,et al.  Possessives in English : an exploration in cognitive grammar , 1996 .

[17]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[18]  E. Hsiao Semantics and Cognition : An Introduction Yuchau , 2005 .

[19]  P. Cadiot,et al.  Pour une théorie des formes sémantiques : motifs, profils, thèmes , 2001 .