Time-to-contact judgment in the locomotion of adults and preschool children.

The hypothesis of Lee (1976)--that approach and deceleration toward a surface can be controlled through the rate of change of the optic variable tau--was examined for natural human locomotion. In Experiment 1, 12 adults were asked to perform locomotor tasks that required running at speed and then decelerating so that either the hand or head made a controlled contact with a door. In Experiment 2, 12 preschool children performed a relay-running task that required similar control. In Experiment 3, 12 children and 12 adults ran with a stick as an extension to their arm length and performed the same task. The results supported Lee's hypothesis for the initial phase of approach, but subjects switched to a separate adjustment phase 2 to 3 arm lengths from the target. Children did not adopt an appropriate tau strategy for collision avoidance and appeared unable to modify their approach strategy to allow for a hand-held stick. Language: en

[1]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[3]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Accuracy of Perceptual Processes Subserving Different Perception–Action Systems , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  David N. Lee,et al.  Regulation of gait in long jumping. , 1982 .

[5]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  M T Turvey,et al.  Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[8]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  T. Bower,et al.  Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables , 1971 .

[10]  C. Hofsten Predictive reaching for moving objects by human infants , 1980 .

[11]  C. Hofsten Catching Skills in Infancy , 1983 .

[12]  C. Lanczos Applied Analysis , 1961 .

[13]  Michelle Fleury,et al.  Components of the Coincidence-Anticipation Behavior of Children Aged from 6 to 11 Years , 1981 .

[14]  J. Tresilian Perceptual Information for the Timing of Interceptive Action , 1990, Perception.

[15]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[18]  J. Wann Trends in the refinement and optimization of fine-motor trajectories. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  Anil V. Phatak,et al.  Things that go bump in the light - On the optical specification of contact severity , 1993 .