THE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS

Foreign language learning contrasts with native language development in two key respects: It is unreliable and it is nonconvergent. At the same time, it is clear that foreign languages are languages. The fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH) was introduced as a way to account for the general characteristics of foreign language learning. The FDH was originally formulated in the context of the theory of rich Universal Grammar, and this theory has guided much foreign language acquisition research over the past two decades. However, advances in the understanding of language have undermined much of the supporting framework. The FDH—indeed all of SLA research—must be rethought in light of these advances. It is proposed here that (a) foreign language grammars make central use of patches, which are also seen as peripheral phenomena in native languages; (b) non-domain-specifi c processes are used in foreign language acquisition, but that these are also employed— although more effectively because they are integrated into the language system—by native language development; and (c) foreign language online processing relies heavily on the use of shallow parses, but these are also available in native language processing, although less crucially.

[1]  William O'Grady,et al.  Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax , 2005 .

[2]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Frontmatter , 1989 .

[3]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  Is there a critical period for semantics? , 2006 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind: Naturalism and dualism in the study of language and mind , 2008 .

[5]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  Word Order and Nominative Case in Non-Native Language Acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage , 1994 .

[6]  HELMUT WEISS.  ON TWO TYPES OF NATURAL LANGUAGES. SOME CONSEQUENCES FOR LINGUISTICS , 2001 .

[7]  SHALOM LAPPIN,et al.  Machine learning theory and practice as a source of insight into universal grammar , 2007 .

[8]  Robert Kluender,et al.  On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective , 1998 .

[9]  A. Belletti.  Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.3 , 2004 .

[10]  Juliette Blevins.  A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology , 2006 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[12]  Elliot L. Judd,et al.  Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[13]  Ken Hale,et al.  Can UG and L1 be distinguished in L2 acquisition? , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Lydia White,et al.  Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement , 2000 .

[15]  Lynn Eubank,et al.  On the Transfer of Parametric Values in L2 Development , 1993 .

[16]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[17]  Lydia White.  Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom , 1991 .

[18]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Language acquisition studies in generative grammar : papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops , 1994 .

[19]  J. Berger.  Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  Lydia White,et al.  Long and Short Verb Movement in Second Language Acquisition , 1992, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[21]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[22]  H. Weiss.  Syntax des Bairischen : Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache , 1998 .

[23]  Lydia White,et al.  Universal Grammar and second language acquisition , 1989 .

[24]  Julia Herschensohn,et al.  The Second Time Around – Minimalism and L2 Acquisition , 2000 .

[25]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  The Who/Whom Puzzle: On The Preservation Of An Archaic Feature , 2000 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and representations , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[28]  Pierre Pica.  Introduction to the linguistic Variation yearbook , 2003 .

[29]  S. Montrul.  TRANSITIVITY ALTERNATIONS IN L2 ACQUISITION Toward a Modular View of Transfer , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[30]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[31]  M. Paradis.  A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism , 2004 .

[32]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[33]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[34]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation , 2004 .

[35]  Lynn Eubank,et al.  Optionality and the Initial State in L2 Development , 1994 .

[36]  Claudia Felser,et al.  Continuity and shallow structures in language processing , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[37]  Cecilia Yuet Hung Chan,et al.  The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’ , 1997 .

[38]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Partially Distribution-Free Learning of Regular Languages from Positive Samples , 2004, COLING.

[39]  H. Weiß.  A question of relevance: some remarks on standard languages , 2004 .

[40]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[41]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[42]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[43]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[44]  Lynn Eubank,et al.  Negation in early German-English Interlanguage: more Valueless Features in the L2 initial state , 1996 .

[45]  Donna Lardiere.  Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state , 1998 .

[46]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Learning Auxiliary Fronting with Grammatical Inference , 2006, CoNLL.

[47]  R. Hawkins.  Second Language Syntax: A Generative Introduction , 2001 .

[48]  C. Felser,et al.  Grammatical processing in language learners , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[49]  S. Pinker,et al.  The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.

[50]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[51]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[52]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[53]  G. Ioup,et al.  Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[54]  Donna Lardiere,et al.  Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar , 1998 .

[55]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[56]  N. Sobin.  Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses , 1997 .

[57]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[58]  N. Ellis,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of languages , 1997 .

[59]  Maria-Luise Beck,et al.  L2 ACQUISITION AND OBLIGATORY HEAD MOVEMENT , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[60]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[61]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: new evidence from reaction-time experiments , 1995 .

[62]  J. Hawkins.  PROCESSING COMPLEXITY AND FILLER-GAP DEPENDENCIES ACROSS GRAMMARS , 1999 .

[63]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Alternative Minimalist Visions of Language , 2011 .

[64]  Lydia White,et al.  The Verb-Movement Parameter in Second Language Acquisition , 1990 .

[65]  Noam Chomsky.  Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[66]  Barbara C. Scholz,et al.  Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments , 2002 .

[67]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[68]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[69]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[70]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[71]  M. Ullman.  The declarative/procedural model and the shallow structure hypothesis , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[72]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[73]  Noam Chomsky.  Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[74]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Return of Constructions , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[75]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  A theory of the learnable , 1984, STOC '84.

[76]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Polynomial Identification in the Limit of Substitutable Context-free Languages , 2005 .

[77]  Kevin R. Gregg.  UG and SLA: The access question, and how to beg it , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[78]  Michael T. Ullman,et al.  The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model , 2001 .

[79]  Laurent Dekydtspotter,et al.  Quelque chose … de remarquable in English-French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation , 2005 .

[80]  Lydia White,et al.  Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[81]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  A Festschrift for Sol Saporta , 1986 .

[82]  Andrew Kehler,et al.  Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.